Cited by 25Tactile and Sensory InteractionsSpatial Cognition and NavigationMotor Control and Adaptation

Spatial updating depends on gaze direction even after loss of vision

Open access
Reuschel, Johanna, Rösler, Frank, Henriques, Denise Y. P., Fiehler, Katja·2012·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Direction of gaze (eye angle + head angle) has been shown to be important for representing space for action, implying a crucial role of vision for spatial updating. However, blind people have no access to vision yet are able to perform goal-directed actions successfully. Here, we investigated the role of visual experience for localizing and updating targets as a function of intervening gaze shifts in humans. People who differed in visual experience (late blind, congenitally blind, or sighted) were briefly presented with a proprioceptive reach target while facing it. Before they reached to the target's remembered location, they turned their head toward an eccentric direction that also induced corresponding eye movements in sighted and late blind individuals. We found that reaching errors varied systematically as a function of shift in gaze direction only in participants with early visual experience (sighted and late blind). In the late blind, this effect was solely present in people with moveable eyes but not in people with at least one glass eye. Our results suggest that the effect of gaze shifts on spatial updating develops on the basis of visual experience early in life and remains even after loss of vision as long as feedback from the eyes and head is available.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2714-11.2012

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reuschel, J., Rösler, F., Henriques, D. Y. P., & Fiehler, K.
Affiliations
  • Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
  • University of Potsdam (DE)
  • York University (CA)
  • Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
Corresponding author
Fiehler, Katja
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2012-02-14
Volume
32
Issue
7
Pages
2422-2429
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2028890621
Cited by
25
References
59
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • publish.UP (University of Potsdam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
spatial updating, gaze direction, visual experience, late blindness, congenital blindness, proprioception, eye movements, head movement, spatial localization, visual feedback, visuomotor control
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Blindness, Eye Movements, Female, Humans, Male, Movement, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Space Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review