Cited by 132Animal Behavior and ReproductionPrimate Behavior and EcologyEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Mating patterns in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri oerstedi): Implications for seasonal sexual dimorphism

Boinski, S.·1987·Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00324430

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boinski, S.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Boinski, S.
Venue
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
Published
1987-07
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
13-21
ISSN
  • 0340-5443 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0762
OpenAlex
W2324600423
Cited by
132
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
squirrel monkey, mating systems, female mate choice, breeding season, Corcovado National Park

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review