Cited by 53Fungal and yeast genetics researchRedox biology and oxidative stressBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

Mechanism of resistance to sulphite in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Open access
Casalone, Enrico, Colella, Carlo M., Daly, Simona, Gallori, Enzo, Moriani, Luca, Polsinelli, Mario·1992·Current Genetics

Abstract

Growth inhibition and cell killing caused by sulphite were reduced in seven Saccharomyces cerevisiae sulphite-resistant independent mutants, compared to their parental strains. Genetic analysis showed that in the seven mutants resistance was inherited as a single-gene dominant mutation and that all the analyzed mutations were allelic, thus identifying a major gene responsible for sulphite resistance in S. cerevisiae. Two of the mutants, MBS20-9 and MBS30, were further characterized. 35S-sulphite uptake experiments showed that the ability to accumulate sulphite was markedly reduced in the two resistant strains. No difference between resistant and sensitive strains with respect to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase sensitivity to sulphite, or to intracellular glutathione content, were revealed. In contrast, the extracellular acetaldehyde concentration was higher in the resistant mutants, both in the presence and in the absence of sulphite.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00326407

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sulfite-resistant strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae produce much more acetaldehyde than parental non-resistant strains.

    “sulfiteresistant strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae produce much more acetaldehyde than parental non-resistant strains (Casalone et al. 1992).”

    From Yeast and bacterial modulation of wine aroma and flavour (2005) · cites this paper as Casalone et al. 1992

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Casalone, E., Colella, C. M., Daly, S., Gallori, E., Moriani, L., & Polsinelli, M.
Affiliations
University of Florence (IT)
Venue
Current Genetics
Published
1992-12
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
435-440
ISSN
  • 0172-8083 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0983
OpenAlex
W2066651690
Cited by
53
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, allelic mutations, acetaldehyde, glutathione, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, yeast mutants
MeSH terms
Drug Resistance, Microbial, Fungal Proteins, Genes, Fungal, Glutathione, Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenases, Kinetics, Mutation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Sulfites

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review