Cited by 1,106Visual perception and processing mechanismsBlind Source Separation TechniquesFace Recognition and Perception

Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex

Open access
van Hateren, J. H., van der Schaaf, A.·1998·Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Properties of the receptive fields of simple cells in macaque cortex were compared with properties of independent component filters generated by independent component analysis (ICA) on a large set of natural images. Histograms of spatial frequency bandwidth, orientation tuning bandwidth, aspect ratio and length of the receptive fields match well. This indicates that simple cells are well tuned to the expected statistics of natural stimuli. There is no match, however, in calculated and measured distributions for the peak of the spatial frequency response: the filters produced by ICA do not vary their spatial scale as much as simple cells do, but are fixed to scales close to the finest ones allowed by the sampling lattice. Possible ways to resolve this discrepancy are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.1998.0303

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A collection of 4,167 digital photographs of random outdoor scenes was assembled in the late 1990s by van Hateren and van der Schaaf.

    “A collection of 4,167 digital photographs of random outdoor scenes was assembled in the late 1990s by van Hateren and van der Schaaf [20].”

    From Barcodes: the persistent topology of data (2007) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Images section describes a collection photographed with a digital camera, but gives its size as 4,212 images, not 4,167. It says the images came from woods, open landscapes and urban areas, often in consecutive series, rather than describing them as random outdoor scenes. The paper was published in 1998, but the passage does not specify when the photographs were taken. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [15]15. Field, D. J. 1993 Scale-invariance and self-similar `wavelet' transforms: an analysis of natural scenes and mammalian visual systems. In Wavelets, fractals, and fourier transforms (ed. M. Farge, J. C. R. Hunt & J. C. Vassilicos), pp. 151^193. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  2. [17]17. Harpur, G. F. 1997 Low entropy coding with unsupervised neural networks. Thesis, University of Cambridge.
  3. [23]23. Hurri, J. 1997 Independent component analysis of image data. Master thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, Laboratory of Computer and Information Science.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Hateren, J. H., & van der Schaaf, A.
Affiliations
Department of Biophysics, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, NL–9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
Published
1998-03-07
Volume
265
Issue
1394
Pages
359-366
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W2101933716
Cited by
1,106
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 58 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 46
FWCI
19.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Blind Source Separation Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
independent component analysis, natural images, simple cells, primary visual cortex, receptive fields, spatial frequency tuning, orientation tuning, macaque cortex, sampling lattices
MeSH terms
Animals, Eidetic Imagery, Information Theory, Macaca, Neurons, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review