The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relationships between growth, photosynthesis and competitive interactions for a C3 and C4 plant
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Climatic patterns and the distribution of C4 grasses in North America
Teeri, J. A., & Stowe, L. G. (1976) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00351210 · Cited by 749
Cited by
Dusenge, M. E., Duarte, A. G., & Way, D. A. (2019) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.15283 · Cited by 1,116
Evolutionary and Ecological Aspects of Photosynthetic Pathway Variation
Ehleringer, J. R., & Monson, R. K. (1993) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.24.1.411 · Cited by 836
Comparative ecophysiology of C3 and C4 plants
PEARCY, R. W., & EHLERINGER, J. (1984) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1984.tb01194.x · Cited by 555
Self-citationThe Biogeography of C4 Photosynthesis: Patterns and Controlling Factors
Sage, R. F., Wedin, D. A., & Li, M. (1999) · C4 Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/b978-012614440-6/50011-2 · Cited by 417
The distribution of C3 and C4 grasses in Australia in relation to climate
Hattersley, P. W. (1983) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00379569 · Cited by 362
Metadata
- Authors
- Pearcy, R. W., Tumosa, N., & Williams, K.
- Venue
- Oecologia
- Published
- 1981-03
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 371-376
- ISSN
- 0029-8549 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1939
- OpenAlex
- W2024512015
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
