The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Marr's three levels: A re-evaluation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Special sciences (or: The disunity of science as a working hypothesis)
Fodor, J. A. (1974) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/bf00485230 · Cited by 1,815
Cited by
Solving the Black Box Problem: A Normative Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence
Zednik, C. (2021) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-019-00382-7 · Cited by 419
The Border Between Seeing and Thinking
Block, N. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197622223.001.0001 · Cited by 367
The Method of Levels of Abstraction
Floridi, L. (2008) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-008-9113-7 · Cited by 349
Expectation in Melody: The Influence of Context and Learning
Pearce, M. T., & Wiggins, G. A. (2006) · Music Perception · doi:10.1525/mp.2006.23.5.377 · Cited by 297
The Ontology of Complex Systems: Levels of Organization, Perspectives, and Causal Thickets
Wimsatt, W. C. (1994) · Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume · doi:10.1080/00455091.1994.10717400 · Cited by 291
Metadata
- Authors
- McClamrock, R.
- Venue
- Minds and Machines
- Published
- 1991-05
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 185-196
- ISSN
- 0924-6495 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-8641
- OpenAlex
- W1973961639
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Marr's three levels: A re-evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf00361036
- The paper
- McClamrock, R. (1991). Marr's three levels: A re-evaluation. Minds and Machines. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00361036
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
