Cited by 1,815Philosophy and History of SciencePhilosophy, Science, and HistoryEpistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics

Special sciences (or: The disunity of science as a working hypothesis)

Fodor, J. A.·1974·Synthese

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00485230

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Any function can be implemented by different physical systems.

    “It is well known that any function can be implemented by di ff erent physical systems (Bechtel & Mundale, 1999; Fodor, 1974).”

    From Hard criteria for empirical theories of consciousness (2021) · cites this paper as Fodor, 1974

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fodor, J. A.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Fodor, J. A.
Venue
Synthese
Published
1974-10
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
97-115
ISSN
  • 0039-7857 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0964
OpenAlex
W2057683160
Cited by
1,815
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 78 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 116 · 2021: 104 · 2020: 106 · 2019: 127 · 2018: 108 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 81 · 2015: 72 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 38
FWCI
12.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Synthese (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy, Science, and History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Keywords
special sciences, disunity of science, working hypothesis, philosophy of science, scientific realism, reductionism, philosophy of biology, philosophy of chemistry, philosophy of physics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review