Cited by 102Geological and Geochemical AnalysisGeological Studies and ExplorationGeochemistry and Geochronology of Asian Mineral Deposits

Precise U-Pb zircon ages for the Molson dyke swarm and the Fox River sill: constraints for Early Proterozoic crustal evolution in northeastern Manitoba, Canada

Heaman, L. M., Machado, N., Krogh, T. E., Weber, W.·1986·Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00371229

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heaman, L. M., Machado, N., Krogh, T. E., & Weber, W.
Affiliations
Royal Ontario Museum (CA)
Venue
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology
Published
1986-09
Volume
94
Issue
1
Pages
82-89
ISSN
  • 0010-7999 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0967
OpenAlex
W1986680173
Cited by
102
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological Studies and Exploration
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Geochemistry and Geochronology of Asian Mineral Deposits
Keywords
zircon U-Pb geochronology, mafic dykes, Superior Province, Trans-Hudson Orogen, crustal evolution, deformation timing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review