Cited by 78Crustacean biology and ecologyInvertebrate Taxonomy and EcologyIsotope Analysis in Ecology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The effects of food quality on the life history parameters of the terrestrial isopod (Armadillidium vulgare (Latreille))

Abstract

Growth, reproduction, and survivorship of Armadillidium vulgare have been observed when laboratory populations were fed experimental diets consisting of leaves from different species of plant in different states of decay.Growth and fecundity were highest when the foods consisted of standing dead dicotyledonous plant leaves. Feeding on monocotyledonous material caused increased mortality as well as reducing both growth rates and reproductive output to very low levels. When the dicotyledonous material was extensively decayed before feeding, growth rates and survivorship decreased but this treatment did not significantly alter the results for monocotyledonous foods.Growth and survivorship rates were not significantly correlated with the total nitrogen content of the food but appeared to be related to the extent to which it could be digested and absorbed across the gut wall.Some of the implications of these results for the dynamics of field populations of terrestrial isopods are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00379587

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Al Dabbagh KY (1976) Population dynamics and bio-energetics of the terrestrial isopod Armadillidium vulgare (Lat.) in grassland ecosystems. Ph D Thesis University of Leicester
  2. Al Dabbagh KY, Block W (1981) The population ecology of a terrestrial isopod in two breckland grass-heaths. J Anim Ecol 50:61?77 · DOI
  3. Booth RG, Anderson JM (1979) The influence of fungal food quality on the growth and fecundity of Folsomia canida (Collembola: Isotomidae). Oecologia (Berl) 38:317?323 · DOI
  4. Darwin C (1886) The origin of species by means of natural selection 6th Edition, Murray, London
  5. Hassall M (1976) Studies on the biology of Philoscia muscorum (Crustacea: Isopoda) with particular reference to its role in a dune grassland ecosystem. Ph D Thesis, University of Leeds
  6. Hasall M (1977) Consumption of leaf litter by the terrestrial isopod Philoscia muscorum in relation to food availability in a dune grassland ecosystem. Ecol Bull (Stockholm) 25:550?553
  7. Hubbell SP (1971) Of sowbugs and systems: the ecological bioenergetics of a terrestrial isopod. Systems analysis and simulation in ecology. Vol 1 (Ed BC Patten) 269?324, Academic Press, New York and London
  8. Hughes RD, Walker J (1970) The role of food in the population dynamicsof the Australian Bush Fly Musca vetustissima. Brit Ecol Soc Symp No 10 Animal populations in relation to their food supply. Watson A (ed) Blackwell, Oxford pp 255?269
  9. Iverson JM (1974) Ingestion and growth in Sericostoma personatum (Trichoptera) in relation to the nitrogen content of ingested leaves. Oikos, 25:278?282 · DOI
  10. Kheirallah AM, El-Sharkaway K (1981) Growth rate and natality of Porcellio olivieri (Crustacea: Isopoda) on different foods. Pedobiologia 22:262?267 · DOI
  11. Lawton JH, McNeill S (1979) Between the devil and the deep blue sea: on the problem of being a herbivore. Brit Ecol Soc Symp No 20. Population Dynamics, Anderson R, Turner B, Taylor LR (eds) Ch 11 Blackwell, Oxford pp 223?244
  12. Malthus TR (1798) First essay on population. Macmillan, London 1966
  13. McNeill S, Southwood TRE (1978) The role of nitrogen in the development of insect plant relationships. Ann P Phyt 15:77?98
  14. McQueen DJ (1976a) Procellio spinicornis Say (Isopoda) demography. II A comparison between field and laboratory data. Can J Zool 54:825?842 · DOI
  15. McQueen DJ (1976b) Porcellio spinicornis Say (Isopoda) demography III A comparison between field data and the results of a simulation model. Can J Zool 54:2174?2184 · DOI
  16. McQueen DJ (1976c) The influence of climatic factors on the demography of the terrestrial isopod Tracheoniscus rathkei. Can J Zool 54:2185?2199 · DOI
  17. McQueen DJ, Carnio JS (1974) A laboratory study of the effects of some climatic factors on the demography of the terrestrial isopod Porcellio spinicornis (Say). Can J Zool 52:599?611 · DOI
  18. Merriam HG (1971) Sensitivity of terrestrial isopod populations (Armadillidium) to food quality differences. Can J Zool 49:667?674 · DOI
  19. Neuhauser E, Hartenstein RH, Kaplan DL (1981) Growth of the earthworm Eisenia foetida in relation to population density and food rationing. Oikos 35(1):93?98 · DOI
  20. Rushton SP (1981) The effects of food quality on the population dynamics of Armadillidium vulgare (Latreille) Ph D Thesis, University of East Anglia
  21. Rushton SP, Hassall M (1983) Food and feeding rates of the terrestrial isopod Armadillidium vulgare Latreille · DOI · Paper page
  22. Stachurski A (1968) Emigration, mortality rates and food shelter conditions of Ligidium hypnorum L. (Isopoda) Ekol pol Ser A 16:445?459
  23. Stachurski A (1972) Population density; biomass and maximum natality rate and food conditions in Ligidium hypnorum L. (Isopoda) Ekol pol Ser A 20:185?197
  24. Tsukomoto J (1977) Soil macroanimals on a slope in a deciduous broad leaved forest. I Two species of terrestrial isopoda Ligidium japonicum and L. paulum. Jap J Ecol 26:201?206
  25. Watson A (1970) Animal populations in relation to their food supply. Brit Ecol Soc Sympsoium No 10 Blackwell, Oxford
  26. Watt AS (1940) Studies in the ecology of Breckland. IV The grassheath. J Ecol 28:42?70 · DOI
  27. White TCR (1978) The importance of a relative shortage of food in animal ecology. Oecologia (Berlin) 33:71?86 · DOI
  28. Wilkins A (1978) An analysis of the population dynamics of Philoscia muscorum (Isopoda: Oniscoidea) a modelling approach. Ph D Thesis University of Leeds

Metadata

Authors
Rushton, S. P., & Hassall, M.
Affiliations
University of East Anglia (GB)
Venue
Oecologia
Published
1983-03
Volume
57
Issue
1-2
Pages
257-261
ISSN
  • 0029-8549 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1939
OpenAlex
W2089222765
Cited by
78
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oecologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Crustacean biology and ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Isotope Analysis in Ecology
Keywords
Armadillidium vulgare, terrestrial isopods, food quality, growth rate, fecundity, survivorship, nitrogen content, nutrient digestibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review