Cited by 36Ethics in Business and EducationGender Diversity and InequalityPsychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

Correlation of gender-related values of independence and relationship and leadership orientation

Butz, Clarence E., Lewis, Phillip V.·1996·Journal of Business Ethics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00412813

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women generally display higher relationship and caring characteristics.

    “and generally display higher relationship and caring characteristics (Butz & Lewis, 1996;Fridell et al., 2009).”

    From Servant Leadership and Employee Engagement: A Qualitative Study (2022) · cites this paper as Butz & Lewis, 1996

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Butz, C. E., & Lewis, P. V.
Affiliations
Azusa Pacific University (US)
Venue
Journal of Business Ethics
Published
1996-11
Volume
15
Issue
11
Pages
1141-1149
ISSN
  • 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0697
OpenAlex
W2037978542
Cited by
36
References
64
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Business Ethics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Keywords
gender differences, moral reasoning, leadership orientation, leadership values, gender and leadership

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review