The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Religiosity, ethical ideology, and intentions to report a peer's wrongdoing
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/bf02723327 · Cited by 26,163
(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 25,810
(2013) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr · Cited by 6,716
Personal Religious Orientation and Prejudice.
Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.5.4.432 · Cited by 4,533
Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model
Jones, T. M. (1991) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258867 · Cited by 4,135
(1986) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 3,204
(1970) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-10497-7 · Cited by 2,865
A General Theory of Marketing Ethics
Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. (1986) · Journal of Macromarketing · doi:10.1177/027614678600600103 · Cited by 2,592
Prosocial Organizational Behaviors
Brief, A. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258391 · Cited by 2,085
A taxonomy of ethical ideologies.
Forsyth, D. R. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.39.1.175 · Cited by 1,535
Cited by
13 Ethical Decision Making: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going
Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Smith‐Crowe, K. (2008) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.1080/19416520802211677 · Cited by 687
Convenience samples of college students and research reproducibility
Peterson, R. A., & Merunka, D. R. (2014) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.08.010 · Cited by 567
Exploring Social Desirability Bias
Chung, J., & Monroe, G. S. (2003) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1023/a:1023648703356 · Cited by 559
Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., & Franke, G. R. (1999) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070399271002 · Cited by 414
Religion and Attitudes to Corporate Social Responsibility in a Large Cross-Country Sample
Brammer, S., Williams, G., & Zinkin, J. (2007) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9136-z · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Barnett, T., Bass, K., & Brown, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Ethics
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1161-1174
- ISSN
- 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0697
- OpenAlex
- W2056040973
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 11.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Religiosity, ethical ideology, and intentions to report a peer's wrongdoing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf00412815
- The paper
- Barnett, T., Bass, K., & Brown, G. (1996). Religiosity, ethical ideology, and intentions to report a peer's wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00412815
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
