The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring Social Desirability Bias
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960) · Journal of Consulting Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0047358 · Cited by 8,686
Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings.
Jolliffe, I. T., Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1988) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.2307/2983017 · Cited by 5,077
Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model
Jones, T. M. (1991) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258867 · Cited by 4,135
Two-component models of socially desirable responding.
Paulhus, D. L. (1984) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598 · Cited by 3,013
Survey Errors and Survey Costs.
Faulkenberry, G. D., & Groves, R. M. (1990) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289634 · Cited by 1,438
Survey Errors and Survey Costs
Groves, R. M. (1989) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725277 · Cited by 1,062
Religion and Society in Tension.
Yinger, J. M., Glock, C. Y., & Stark, R. (1966) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2090948 · Cited by 1,029
Religiosity and ethical behavior in organizations: a symbolic interactionist perspective
Weaver, G. R., & Agle, B. R. (2002) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/4134370 · Cited by 954
Socially Desirable Responding in Organizational Behavior: A Reconception
Zerbe, W. J., & Paulhus, D. L. (1987) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258533 · Cited by 693
Consumer religiosity and retail store evaluative criteria
McDaniel, S. W., & Burnett, J. J. (1990) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/bf02726426 · Cited by 581
Cited by
Farooq, O., Rupp, D. E., & Farooq, M. (2017) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0849 · Cited by 649
Do Consumers Care About Ethical-Luxury?
Davies, I. A., Lee, Z., & Ahonkhai, I. (2012) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1071-y · Cited by 375
Dalton, D., & Ortegren, M. (2011) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0843-8 · Cited by 289
Fisk, R., Grove, S., Harris, L. C., Keeffe, D. A., Daunt, K. L., Russell‐Bennett, R., & Wirtz, J. (2010) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/08876041011072537 · Cited by 288
Leonidou, L. C., Kvasova, O., Leonidou, C. N., & Chari, S. (2013) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1267-9 · Cited by 138
Metadata
- Authors
- Chung, J., & Monroe, G. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Ethics
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 291-302
- ISSN
- 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0697
- OpenAlex
- W1562377822
- Cited by
- 559
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 10.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploring Social Desirability Bias. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1023/a:1023648703356
- The paper
- Chung, J., & Monroe, G. S. (2003). Exploring Social Desirability Bias. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1023648703356
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
