CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 65Cardiovascular and exercise physiologySmoking Behavior and CessationExercise and Physiological Responses

Acute effects of cigarette smoking and inhalation of carbon monoxide during maximal exercise

Klausen, K., Andersen, C., Nandrup, S.·1983·European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology
DOI 10.1007/bf00429074
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The acute effect of inhaling the smoke of three cigarettes was compared to the effect of inhalation of an amount of carbon monoxide (CO), giving the same CO-saturation of the arterial blood as smoking during rest and during maximal exercise on a Krogh cycle ergometer. Sixteen male subjects were tested in the morning (1) after about 8 h without smoking (control), (2) after inhalation of the smoke of three cigarettes (smoke), and (3) after CO-inhalation (CO). It was found that the average maximal rate of O2-uptake (VO2 max) decreased during both smoke and CO by about 7%. Endurance time at VO2 max decreased 20% during smoke but only 10% during CO. A significant decrease in maximal heart rate (HR), and an increase in HR at rest, was demonstrated only during smoke. The peak lactate concentration (HLa) following maximal exercise was significantly decreased after smoke. The results suggest that the decrease in VO2 max during smoke is due to the CO-saturation of the blood, and hence to a decrease in the oxygen capacity of the blood, while the decrease in endurance time during smoke is combined effect of the CO-saturation and an increased cost of breathing caused by the smoke particles. It is further suggested that nicotine, or possibly some other components of the smoke, have an enhancing effect on the heart at rest rest, while an inhibition is seen during maximal exercise.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00429074

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Mollerup P (1974) Tobaksrygnings momentane effekt på den menneskelige organisme. Tidsskr f LegemsØv 5: 133–139

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Klausen, K., Andersen, C., & Nandrup, S.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
ORCID
Klausen, K.
Venue
European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1983-09
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
371-379
ISSN
  • 0020-9376 (ISSN-L)
  • 0301-5548
  • 1439-6327
DOI
10.1007/bf00429074
OpenAlex
W2066183007
Cited by
65
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • European Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
cigarette smoking, carbon monoxide inhalation, maximal exercise, oxygen consumption, VO2max, endurance time, heart rate, blood lactate, nicotine
MeSH terms
Adult, Carbon Monoxide, Depression, Chemical, Physical Exertion, Heart Rate, Humans, Lactates, Male, Nicotine, Oxygen Consumption, Rest, Smoke, Smoking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review