Cited by 238Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorAmphibian and Reptile BiologyMarine animal studies overview

Sound pressure levels and radiation patterns of the vocalizations of some North American frogs and toads

Gerhardt, H. Carl·1975·Journal of Comparative Physiology A

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00657481

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gerhardt, H. C.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Gerhardt, H. Carl
Venue
Journal of Comparative Physiology A
Published
1975
Volume
102
Issue
1
Pages
1-12
ISSN
  • 0340-7594 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1351
OpenAlex
W2094678072
Cited by
236
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI
6.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Comparative Physiology A (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
Keywords
frog vocalization, sound pressure level, directivity pattern, body size, Bufo americanus, Hyla chrysoscelis, intraspecific variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review