The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nonlocality and the Kochen-Specker paradox
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox
Bell, J. S. (1964) · Physics Physique Fizika · doi:10.1103/physicsphysiquefizika.1.195 · Cited by 12,252
Cited by
Nonlocality for two particles without inequalities for almost all entangled states
Hardy, L. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.1665 · Cited by 772
Realizable higher-dimensional two-particle entanglements via multiport beam splitters
Z-dotukowski, M., Zeilinger, A., & Horne, M. A. (1997) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.55.2564 · Cited by 234
Ladder Proof of Nonlocality without Inequalities: Theoretical and Experimental Results
Boschi, D., Branca, S., De Martini, F., & Hardy, L. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.79.2755 · Cited by 170
Experimental test of the violation of local realism in quantum mechanics without Bell inequalities
Di Giuseppe, G., De Martini, F., & Boschi, D. (1997) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.56.176 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Heywood, P., & Redhead, M. L. G.
- Venue
- Foundations of Physics
- Published
- 1983-05
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 481-499
- ISSN
- 0015-9018 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9516
- OpenAlex
- W2000068061
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonlocality and the Kochen-Specker paradox. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf00729511
- The paper
- Heywood, P., & Redhead, M. L. G. (1983). Nonlocality and the Kochen-Specker paradox. Foundations of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00729511
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
