CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 234

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Realizable higher-dimensional two-particle entanglements via multiport beam splitters

Z-dotukowski, Marek, Zeilinger, Anton, Horne, Michael A.·1997·Physical Review A
DOI 10.1103/physreva.55.2564
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Multiport beam splitters are shown to be applicable in feasible optical realizations of higher-dimensional EPR correlations, and of tests of local realism involving measurements of nondichotomic variables. These multiports permit optical realizations of any unitary operator in Hilbert spaces of arbitrary finite dimension. Thus it is shown that one is by no means constrained to entangled spin systems, and to Stern-Gerlach apparatuses. In the analysis the concept of generalized Bell numbers is employed, which is more suitable than the standard set of spin eigenvalues. The results presented here move the discussion on entangled higher-than- spin systems from the realm of gedanken experiments to real experiments.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.55.2564

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Boson sampling challenges the extended Church-Turing thesis.

    “In addition, it is also suggested that this challenges a fundamental principle of computer science, namely the extended Church-Turing thesis.”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [166]

  • Calculating the output probability distribution for a sufficiently large number of photons interfering in a large multiport arrangement is exponentially hard to solve classically.

    “It has been shown that calculating the output probability distribution for a sufficiently large number of photons interfering in a large multiport arrangement is exponentially hard to solve classically”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [166]

  • Boson sampling is considered a promising candidate to show quantum supremacy.

    “and as such it is considered to be a promising candidate to show quantum supremacy.”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [166]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. E. Schrödinger, 1935, Naturwissenschaften, 23, 807, 10.1007/BF01491891 · DOI · Paper page
  2. E. Schrödinger, 1935, Naturwissenschaften, 23, 823, 10.1007/BF01491914 · DOI
  3. S. J. Freedman, 1972, Phys. Rev. Lett., 28, 938, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.28.938 · DOI · Paper page
  4. P. R. Tapster, 1994, Phys. Rev. Lett., 73, 1923, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.1923 · DOI
  5. E. Santos, 1992, Phys. Rev. A, 46, 3646, 10.1103/PhysRevA.46.3646 · DOI
  6. J. F. Clauser, 1978, Rep. Prog. Phys., 41, 1881, 10.1088/0034-4885/41/12/002 · DOI · Paper page
  7. L. E. Ballentine, 1987, Am. J. Phys., 55, 785, 10.1119/1.14988 · DOI
  8. D. M. Greenberger, 1990, Am. J. Phys., 58, 1131, 10.1119/1.16243 · DOI · Paper page
  9. A. V. Belinskii, 1992, Laser Phys., 2, 112
  10. A. V. Belinskii, 1993, Usp. Fiz. Nauk, 163, 1, 10.3367/UFNr.0163.199308a.0001 · DOI
  11. M. A. Horne, 1985, Symposium on Foundations of Modern Physics
  12. M. Zukowski, 1988, Phys. Lett. A, 127, 1, 10.1016/0375-9601(88)90954-1 · DOI
  13. M. A. Horne, 1989, Phys. Rev. Lett., 62, 2209, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.2209 · DOI · Paper page
  14. S. Haroche, 1995, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 755, 73, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb38957.x · DOI
  15. K. Wódkiewicz, 1993, Phys. Rev. A, 47, 3280, 10.1103/PhysRevA.47.3280 · DOI
  16. C. H. Bennett, 1992, Phys. Rev. Lett., 69, 2881, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2881 · DOI · Paper page
  17. A. M. Steinberg, 1993, Phys. Rev. Lett., 71, 708, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.708 · DOI
  18. B. Yurke, 1992, Phys. Rev. Lett., 68, 1251, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1251 · DOI
  19. M. Z-dotukowski, 1995, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 755, 91, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb38959.x · DOI · Paper page
  20. A. M. Gleason, 1957, J. Math. Mech., 6, 885
  21. J. S. Bell, 1966, Rev. Mod. Phys., 38, 447, 10.1103/RevModPhys.38.447 · DOI · Paper page
  22. S. Kochen, 1967, J. Math. Mech., 17, 59
  23. P. Heywood, 1983, Found. Phys., 13, 481, 10.1007/BF00729511 · DOI
  24. H. R. Brown, 1990, Found. Phys., 20, 1379, 10.1007/BF01883492 · DOI
  25. C. Mattle, 1995, Appl. Phys. B, 60, S111
  26. G. Weihs, 1996, Opt. Lett., 21, 302, 10.1364/OL.21.000302 · DOI · Paper page
  27. N. G. Walker, 1986, Opt. Quantum Electron., 18, 355, 10.1007/BF02032562 · DOI
  28. N. G. Walker, 1987, J. Mod. Opt., 34, 15, 10.1080/09500348714550131 · DOI
  29. D. N. Klyshko, 1988, Phys. Lett. A, 132, 299, 10.1016/0375-9601(88)90856-0 · DOI
  30. M. Reck, 1994, Phys. Rev. Lett., 73, 58, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.58 · DOI · Paper page
  31. D. Bohm, 1951, Quantum Theory
  32. J. G. Rarity, 1990, Phys. Rev. Lett., 64, 2495, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2495 · DOI · Paper page
  33. H. J. Bernstein, 1974, J. Math. Phys., 15, 1677, 10.1063/1.1666523 · DOI
  34. I. Jex, 1995, Opt. Commun., 117, 95, 10.1016/0030-4018(95)00078-M · DOI
  35. P. Törma, 1996, Phys. Rev. A, 54, 943, 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.4701 · DOI
  36. I. D. Ivanovic, 1981, J. Phys. A, 14, 3241, 10.1088/0305-4470/14/12/019 · DOI
  37. W. K. Wooters, 1986, Found. Phys., 16, 391, 10.1007/BF01882696 · DOI
  38. J. Schwinger, 1960, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 46, 570, 10.1073/pnas.46.4.570 · DOI
  39. B. R. Mollow, 1973, Phys. Rev. A, 8, 2684, 10.1103/PhysRevA.8.2684 · DOI
  40. C. K. Hong, 1985, Phys. Rev. A, 31, 2409, 10.1103/PhysRevA.31.2409 · DOI
  41. J. F. Clauser, 1974, Phys. Rev. D, 10, 526, 10.1103/PhysRevD.10.526 · DOI · Paper page
  42. N. D. Mermin, 1980, Phys. Rev. D, 22, 356, 10.1103/PhysRevD.22.356 · DOI
  43. A. Garg, 1982, Phys. Rev Lett., 49, 901, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.901 · DOI
  44. N. D. Mermin, 1982, Found. Phys., 12, 101, 10.1007/BF00736844 · DOI
  45. M. Ardehali, 1991, Phys. Rev. D, 44, 3336, 10.1103/PhysRevD.44.3336 · DOI
  46. G. S. Agarwal, 1993, Phys. Rev. A, 47, 4608, 10.1103/PhysRevA.47.4608 · DOI
  47. K. Wódkiewicz, 1994, Acta Phys. Pol., 86, 223, 10.12693/APhysPolA.86.223 · DOI
  48. N. D. Mermin, 1993, Rev. Mod. Phys., 65, 803, 10.1103/RevModPhys.65.803 · DOI · Paper page
  49. M. Z-dotukowski, 1994, Laser Phys., 4, 690

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Z-dotukowski, M., Zeilinger, A., & Horne, M. A.
Venue
Physical Review A
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
1997-04-01
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
2564-2579
ISSN
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
DOI
10.1103/physreva.55.2564
Cited by
234
References
9
Language
en
Licence
link.aps.org/licenses/aps-default-license (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review