Cited by 8Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy

Reflectance pulse oximetry in fetal lambs: Subcutaneous vessels and vasoconstriction affect its reliability

Open access
Nijland, Roel, Jongsma, Henk W., Verbruggen, Ineke M., Nijhuis, Jan G.·1996·Journal of Clinical Monitoring

Abstract

Objective Reflectance pulse oximetry (RPOX) has been introduced for intrapartum fetal surveillance. The purpose of this study was to describe two possible effects on the reliability of RPOX, namely the effect of the presence of a subcutaneous vein and the effect of vasoconstriction by adrenaline, both at fetal SaO2 levels.Methods In four anesthetized fetal lambs, a prototype 660/890 nm reflectance sensor (Nellcor Inc.) was placed on the fetal head, with the photodiode of the sensor precisely over a superficial subcutaneous vein. Measurements were made before and after coagulation of the vein. In five anesthetized fetal lambs, one or two reflectance sensors were placed on the fetal head and/or neck and adrenaline was administered in doses of 0.02 to 0.04 mg via a brachial artery. Pulse oximeter saturation readings (SpO2) were compared with continuous arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) values obtained using a fiberoptic catheter (Opticath, Abbott) in the carotid artery.Results When the sensor was placed over the vein, the pulse oximeter read 18% to 24% too low at a SaO2 level of 20% to 50%. After coagulation of the vein, SpO2 readings were in agreement with fiberoptic SaO2 values. Administration of adrenaline resulted in a large overestimation of the SaO2 in 6 of the 7 measurements.Conclusions Subcutaneous veins and vasoconstriction can affect the reliability of reflectance pulse oximetry. As comparable situations may occur during labor, SpO2 readings should be interpreted with caution when this kind or comparable types of RPOX sensors are used at low SaO2 levels.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00857643

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nijland et al. confirmed in fetal lambs that reflectance pulse oximetry SpO2 readings were significantly lower than fiberoptic SaO2 values, and when the vessel was coagulated, this difference became negligible.

    “Nijland et al. also confirmed these results in fetal lambs, where reflectance pulse oximetry SpO2 readings were significantly lower than fiberoptic SaO2 values. However, when the vessel was coagulated, this difference became negligible [128].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nijland, R., Jongsma, H. W., Verbruggen, I. M., & Nijhuis, J. G.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Monitoring
Published
1996-05
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
225-230
ISSN
0748-1977 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999181681
Cited by
8
References
21
Citations by year
2021: 1
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Monitoring (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Keywords
reflectance pulse oximetry, fetal oxygen saturation, subcutaneous veins, vasoconstriction, epinephrine, intrapartum fetal monitoring, fetal sheep, arterial oxygen saturation, sensor reliability
MeSH terms
Animals, Epinephrine, Female, Fetal Blood, Fetal Monitoring, Oximetry, Pregnancy, Sheep, Vasoconstriction, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review