The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A practitioner's guide to meta‐analysis
Abstract
Conclusion: Meta‐analysis can be a powerful and useful technique. In the short term, the results of meta‐analysis can increase understanding and influence the future endeavors of researchers interested in a particular field. Over the long term, meta‐analysis provides a vehicle by which large bodies of research can be integrated and focused on public policy issues. Administrative structures currently exist to foster the relationship between research findings and public policy. As one example, Saxe (1986) has described the activities of the Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) established by Congress to provide lawmakers with scientific information in such a way as to be useful for policy decision‐making. OTA is commissioned by Congress to provide assessments of scientific findings, and meta‐analyses are an ideal resource in this regard. Saxe (1986) notes “In almost all cases, the emphasis is on making sense of already collected data, thus literature reviews and methods for synthesizing research results are relied upon” (pp. 61–62). Whether meta‐analysis actually plays an important role in public policy depends on many factors, not the least of which is the care with which meta‐analyses are conducted. Hopefully, our comments here will help investigators conduct methodologically rigorous meta‐analyses of research relevant to the field of community psychology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1989.10488618 · Cited by 99,167
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
(1990) · Computers, Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,269
(1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,252
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis
Wasserman, S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,326
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068
Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings
Shrout, P. E. (1980) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(80)90063-4 · Cited by 6,010
Distribution Theory for Glass's Estimator of Effect Size and Related Estimators
Hedges, L. V. (1981) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164588 · Cited by 5,695
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
Achenbach, T. M., McConaughy, S. H., & Howell, C. T. (1987) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.213 · Cited by 5,436
Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research
GLASS, G. V. (1976) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x005010003 · Cited by 4,890 · cited 1×
“Since the work of Glass (1976) , meta-analysis has become commonplace within the behavioral and social sciences.”
Cited by
Maternal depression and parenting behavior
Lovejoy, M. C., Graczyk, P. A., O'Hare, E., & Neuman, G. (2000) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/s0272-7358(98)00100-7 · Cited by 2,667
Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields
Elliott, R., Fischer, C. T., & Rennie, D. L. (1999) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466599162782 · Cited by 2,491
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.48.12.1181 · Cited by 2,033
Self-citationEffectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: A meta-analytic review
DuBois, D. L., Holloway, B. E., Valentine, J. C., & Cooper, H. (2002) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1023/a:1014628810714 · Cited by 1,544
“The present research utilizes meta-analysis to review and synthesize the existing empirical literature on youth mentoring programs (Cooper, 1998; Durlak & Lipsey, 1991).”
BackgroundMethodDewald, J. F., Meijer, A. M., Oort, F. J., Kerkhof, G. A., & Bögels, S. M. (2010) · Sleep Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2009.10.004 · Cited by 1,526
Metadata
- Authors
- Durlak, J. A., & Lipsey, M. W.
- Venue
- American Journal of Community Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-06
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 291-332
- ISSN
- 0091-0562 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2770
- OpenAlex
- W1707346075
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 90
- FWCI
- 10.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A practitioner's guide to meta‐analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf00938026
- The paper
- Durlak, J. A., & Lipsey, M. W. (1991). A practitioner's guide to meta‐analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00938026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.