Cited by 47Aesthetic Perception and AnalysisEmotions and Moral BehaviorHumor Studies and Applications

A contrast effect in judgments of own emotional state

Manstead, A. S. R., Wagner, H. L., MacDonald, C. J.·1983·Motivation and Emotion

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00991678

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Manstead, A. S. R., Wagner, H. L., & MacDonald, C. J.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Venue
Motivation and Emotion
Published
1983-09
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
279-290
ISSN
  • 0146-7239 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6644
OpenAlex
W2050277365
Cited by
47
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Motivation and Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Humor Studies and Applications
Keywords
contrast effects, self-reported emotion, horror, audiovisual stimuli, pleasantness, relaxation, funniness, fear

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review