CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 21Monetary Policy and Economic ImpactExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lets keep the con out of experimental a methodological note

Roth, Alvin E.·1994·Empirical Economics
DOI 10.1007/bf01175875
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01175875

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Concerns about inflated findings in empirical and experimental economics have been raised.

    “In economics, concerns about inflated findings in empirical ( 9 ) and experimental analysis ( 10 , 11 ) have also been raised.”

    From Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics (2016) · cites this paper as [10]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Dewald WG, Thursby JG, Anderson RG (1986) Replication in empirical economics: The journal of money, credit and banking project. American Economic Review 76:587?603
  2. Kagel JH, Roth AE (Eds) Handbook of experimental economics. Princeton University Press, forthcoming
  3. Leamer EE (1983) Let's take the con out of econometrics. American Economic Review 73:31?43
  4. National Academy of Sciences (1989) On being a scientist. Committee on the Conduct of Science, Washington, National Academy Press
  5. National Academy of Sciences (1992) Responsible science: Ensuring the integrity of the research process, Volume I. Panel on scientific responsibility and the conduct of research. Washington, National Academy Press.
  6. Roth AE (1994) Introduction to experimental economics. Chapter 1 of Handbook of experimental economics, Kagel J, Roth AE (Eds) Princeton University Press, forthcoming
  7. Roth AE, Erev I (1993) Learning in extensive-form games: Experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term. Mimeo, presented at the Nobel Symposium on Game Theory, June 18?20, Bjorkborn, Sweden

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Roth, A. E.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Roth, Alvin E.
ORCID
Roth, Alvin E.
Venue
Empirical Economics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1994-06
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
279-289
ISSN
  • 0377-7332 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-8921
DOI
10.1007/bf01175875
OpenAlex
W4251790463
Cited by
21
References
8
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Empirical Economics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
experimental economics, experimental method, econometrics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review