A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The KGMHLBC model does not have the scaling property because the variance of the pre-truncation normal is assumed to be constant (not dependent on z).
“This model does not have the scaling property because the variance of the pre-truncation normal is assumed to be constant (not dependent on z).”
From One-Step and Two-Step Estimation of the Effects of Exogenous Variables on Technical Efficiency Levels (2002) · cites this paper as Battese and Coelli (1995)
Cites
Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models
Aigner, D., Lovell, C. A. K., & Schmidt, P. (1977) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5 · Cited by 10,135 · see citing works
Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error
Meeusen, W., & van Den Broeck, J. (1977) · International Economic Review · doi:10.2307/2525757 · Cited by 6,247 · see citing works
Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1992) · Journal of Productivity Analysis · doi:10.1007/bf00158774 · Cited by 2,832 · see citing works
Self-citationJournal of business and economic statistics 5
Fildes, R. A. (1988) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/0169-2070(88)90121-5 · Cited by 2,003 · see citing works
Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. (1988) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(88)90053-x · Cited by 1,919 · see citing works
Self-citationThe measurement and sources of technical inefficiency in the Indonesian weaving industry
Pitt, M. M., & Lee, L. (1981) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-3878(81)90004-3 · Cited by 1,346 · see citing works
Kumbhakar, S. C., Ghosh, S., & McGuckin, J. T. (1991) · Journal of Business & Economic Statistics · doi:10.1080/07350015.1991.10509853 · Cited by 1,162 · see citing works
Likelihood functions for generalized stochastic frontier estimation
Stevenson, R. (1980) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(80)90042-1 · Cited by 1,066 · see citing works
A survey of frontier production functions and of their relationship to efficiency measurement
Førsund, F. R., Lovell, C. A. K., & Schmidt, P. (1980) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(80)90040-8 · Cited by 966 · see citing works
Recent developments in the econometric estimation of frontiers
Bauer, P. W. (1990) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(90)90046-v · Cited by 751 · see citing works
Systematic Departures from the Frontier: A Framework for the Analysis of Firm Inefficiency
Reifschneider, D. L., & Stevenson, R. (1991) · International Economic Review · doi:10.2307/2527115 · Cited by 686 · see citing works
Battese, G. (1992) · Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1016/0169-5150(92)90049-5 · Cited by 670 · see citing works
Self-citationEstimation of a non-neutral stochastic frontier production function
Huang, C. J., & Liu, J.-T. (1994) · Journal of Productivity Analysis · doi:10.1007/bf01073853 · Cited by 593 · see citing works
Frontier Production FunctionsPreprint
Greene, W. H. (1993) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 538 · see citing works
Schmidt, P. S. (1985) · Econometric Reviews · doi:10.1080/07474938608800089 · Cited by 534 · see citing works
The Econometric Approach To Efficiency Analysis
Greene, W. H. (1993) · The Measurement of Productive Efficiency · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195072181.003.0002 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
An Econometric Analysis of Yield Variability in Paddy Production
KALIRAJAN, K. P. (1981) · Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7976.1981.tb02083.x · Cited by 241 · see citing works
A computer program for frontier production function estimation
Coelli, T. (1992) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/0165-1765(92)90096-h · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Measuring bias in self-reported data
Rosenman, R., Tennekoon, V., & Hill, L. G. (2011) · International Journal of Behavioural and Healthcare Research · doi:10.1504/ijbhr.2011.043414 · Cited by 1,050 · see citing works
Wang, H.-J., & Schmidt, P. (2002) · Journal of Productivity Analysis · doi:10.1023/a:1016565719882 · Cited by 1,045 · see citing works
The yield gap of global grain production: A spatial analysis
Neumann, K., Verburg, P. H., Stehfest, E., & Müller, C. (2010) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2010.02.004 · Cited by 587 · see citing works
Technical efficiency in developing country agriculture: a meta‐analysis
Thiam, A., Bravo‐Ureta, B. E., & Rivas, T. E. (2001) · Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1574-0862.2001.tb00204.x · Cited by 297 · see citing works
“Battese and Coelli (1995) India Whole farm 15 82 Battese et al. (1986) Pakistan Wheat 499 68 Battese and Tessema (1993) India Crops 35 84 Dawson et al. (1991) Philippines Rice 22 89 Kalirajan (1991) India Rice 30 69 Kalirajan and Shand (1989) India Rice 34 70 Average 77”
BackgroundWitte, K. D., & Geys, B. (2011) · Journal of Urban Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jue.2010.12.002 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
On the choice of functional form in stochastic frontier modeling
Giannakas, K., Tran, K. C., & Tzouvelekas, V. (2003) · Empirical Economics · doi:10.1007/s001810100120 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Gonzalez, A., Mouquet, N., & Loreau, M. (2009) · Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, and Human Wellbeing · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547951.003.0010 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Van Nguyen, Q., Pascoe, S., Coglan, L., & Nghiem, S. (2021) · Journal of Productivity Analysis · doi:10.1007/s11123-020-00592-8 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Sena, V., & Ozdemir, S. (2020) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.05.016 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Airports’ public infrastructure and sources of inefficiency
Ripoll-Zarraga, A. E. (2023) · Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science · doi:10.1108/jefas-12-2021-0269 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Obalola, O. T., Obayelu, A. E., Coster, A. S., & Alarima, C. I. (2025) · SN Business & Economics · doi:10.1007/s43546-025-00841-8 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J.
- Affiliations
- University of New England (AU)
- ORCID
- Battese, G. E.
- Venue
- Empirical Economics
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 325-332
- ISSN
- 0377-7332 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-8921
- OpenAlex
- W1977845602
- Cited by
- 5,978
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 200 · 2025: 230 · 2024: 226 · 2023: 277 · 2022: 292 · 2021: 328 · 2020: 304 · 2019: 267 · 2018: 291 · 2017: 279 · 2016: 276 · 2015: 294 · 2014: 307 · 2013: 282 · 2012: 263
- FWCI
- 20.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Empirical Economics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Agricultural economics and policies
- Keywords
- stochastic frontier analysis, technical inefficiency, panel data, firm-specific variables, time-varying inefficiency, truncated normal distribution, paddy farmers, agricultural productivity, Indian villages
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
