The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Further explorations in empowerment theory: An empirical analysis of psychological empowerment
Open accessAbstract
Developed empowerment theory and replicated previous research on citizen participation and perceived control. Few investigators have designed studies that specifically test empowerment theory. This research further extends a theoretical model of psychological empowerment that includes intrapersonal, interactional, and behavioral components, by studying a large randomly selected urban and suburban community sample and examining race differences. Results suggest that one underlying dimension that combines different measures of perceived control may be interpreted as the intrapersonal component of psychological empowerment, because it distinguishes groups defined by their level of participation in community organizations and activities (behavioral component). The association found between the intrapersonal and behavioral components is consistent with empowerment theory. Interaction effects between race groups and participation suggest that participation may be more strongly associated with the intrapersonal component of psychological empowerment for African Americans than for white individuals. Implications for empowerment theory and intervention design are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations
Zimmerman, M. A. (1995) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf02506983 · Cited by 2,317
Self-citationZimmerman, M. A. (2000) · Handbook of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6_2 · Cited by 1,653
Self-citationEmpowerment theory, research, and application
Perkins, D. D., & Zimmerman, M. A. (1995) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf02506982 · Cited by 1,509
Self-citationThe enhancement of psychological wellness: Challenges and opportunities
Cowen, E. L. (1994) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf02506861 · Cited by 490
Critical health literacy: A review and critical analysis
Chinn, D. (2011) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.04.004 · Cited by 471
Metadata
- Authors
- Zimmerman, M. A., Israel, B. A., Schulz, A., & Checkoway, B.
- Venue
- American Journal of Community Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-12
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 707-727
- ISSN
- 0091-0562 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2770
- OpenAlex
- W2116782425
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Further explorations in empowerment theory: An empirical analysis of psychological empowerment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf01312604
- The paper
- Zimmerman, M. A., Israel, B. A., Schulz, A., & Checkoway, B. (1992). Further explorations in empowerment theory: An empirical analysis of psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01312604
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.