Cited by 34Psychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth Education and ValidationHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Evaluating composite health measures using Rasch modelling: An illustrative example

Hagquist, Curt·2001·Sozial- und Präventivmedizin SPM

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of the present article is to elucidate the opportunities provided by Rasch modelling in epidemiology and public health research in order to evaluate composite measures of health. Methods The article gives a review of Rasch modelling in conjunction with illustrative examples based on adolescent survey data. Results The article demonstrates how the Rasch-model enables examinations of the way items work across different samples/subgroups, e.g., detection of possible differential item functioning. Conclusions It is concluded that Rasch modelling may serve as a useful tool in the evaluation and the development of composite health measures intended to be used in epidemiology and public health research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01321663

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Local response dependence was indicated for four items.

    “Other reasons may also include multidimensionality [19], which appeared to be the case for three items, or local response dependence [23,29], which was indicated for four items (Table 3).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hagquist, C.
Affiliations
Karlstad University (SE)
Corresponding author
Hagquist, Curt
Venue
Sozial- und Präventivmedizin SPM
Published
2001-11
Volume
46
Issue
6
Pages
369-378
ISSN
  • 0303-8408 (ISSN-L)
  • 1420-911X
OpenAlex
W1972810750
Cited by
34
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
Rasch model, health status measurement, differential item functioning, scale development
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Epidemiology, Female, Humans, Male, Probability, Public Health, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research, Sex Factors, Models, Statistical, Chi-Square Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review