Cited by 65Psychometric Methodologies and TestingOccupational Therapy Practice and ResearchPsychological Testing and Assessment

Rasch analysis of an instrument for measuring occupational value: Implications for theory and practice

Eklund, Mona, Erlandsson, Lena-Karin, Persson, Dennis, Hagell, Peter·2009·Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy

Abstract

This study investigated psychometric properties of an instrument for assessing perceived occupational value, the 26-item OVal-pd. Data from 225 Swedish subjects with and without known mental illness were analysed regarding fit to the Rasch measurement model (partial credit model), differential item functioning (DIF), and functioning of the OVal-pd four-category response scale. The reliability (index of person separation, analogous to Cronbach's alpha) was good (0.92) but there were signs of overall and item level (six items) misfit. There was DIF between people with and without mental illness for three items. Iterative deletion of misfitting items resulted in a new 18-item DIF-free scale with good overall and individual item fit and maintained reliability (0.91). There were no disordered response category thresholds. These observations also held true in separate analyses among people with and without mental illness. Thus, the first steps of ensuring that occupational value can be measured in a valid and reliable way have been taken. Still, occupational value is a dynamic construct and the aspects that fit the construct may vary between contexts. This has implications for, e.g., cross-cultural research and calls for identification of a core set of culture-free items to allow for valid cross-cultural comparisons.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/11038120802596253

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eklund, M., Erlandsson, L.-K., Persson, D., & Hagell, P.
Affiliations
  • Malmö University (SE)
  • Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Eklund, Mona
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy
Published
2009-01
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
118-128
ISSN
  • 1103-8128 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-2014
OpenAlex
W2073224505
Cited by
65
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • Malmö University Publications (Malmö University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
work values, mental illness, psychometric properties, Rasch model, partial credit model, differential item functioning, scale validation, item misfit, cross-cultural measurement, occupational therapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Community Mental Health Services, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Occupational Therapy, Occupations, Outpatients, Professional Practice, Psychometrics, Sweden, Reproducibility of Results, Sickness Impact Profile

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review