Cited by 126

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Why the social sciences won't become high-consensus, rapid-discovery science

Collins, Randall·1994·Sociological Forum

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01476360

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Clayman, Stephen E. 1993 ?Booing: The anatomy of a disaffiliative response.? American Sociological Review 58:110?130. · DOI
  2. Cole, Stephen 1983 ?The hierarchy of the sciences.? American Journal of Sociology 89:111?39. · DOI
  3. Cole, S., J. R. Cole, andJ. Dietrich 1978 ?Measuring the cognitive state of a scientific discipline.? In Y. Elkanaet al. (eds.),Toward a Metric of Science. New York: Wiley.
  4. Collins, Harry M. 1974 ?The TEA set: Tacit knowledge and scientific networks.? Science Studies 4:165?186. · DOI
  5. Collins, Randall 1975 Conflict Sociology: Toward an Explanatory Science. New York: Academic Press.
  6. Collins, Randall 1987 ?A micro-macro theory of creativity in intellectual careers: The case of German idealist philosophy.? Sociological Theory 5:47?69. · DOI
  7. Collins, Randall 1989 ?Toward a theory of intellectual change: The social causes of philosophies.? Science, Technology and Human Values 14:107?140. · DOI
  8. Collins, Randall 1992 ?Can sociology create an artificial intelligence?? In Randall Collins, Sociological Insight, 2nd edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
  9. Collins, Randall 1993 ?Maturation of the state-centered theory of revolution and ideology.? Sociological Theory 11(March):117?128. · DOI
  10. Cozzens, Susan E. 1989 ?What do citations count? The rhetoric-first model.? Scientometrics 15:437?447. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Etzioni, Amitai 1975 A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations. New York: Free Press.
  12. Frede, Michael 1987 Essays in Ancient Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Griffith, Belver C. 1988 ?Derek Price's puzzles: Numerical metaphors for the operation of science.? Science, Technology and Human Values 13:351?360. · DOI
  14. Goldstone, Jack A. 1991 Revolution and Rebellion in the Early Modern World. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  15. Gregory, Stanford 1983 ?A quantitative analysis of temporal symmetry in microsocial relations.? American Sociological Review 48:129?135. · DOI
  16. Gregory, Stanford, Stephen Webster, andGang Huang 1993 ?Voice pitch and amplitude convergence as a metric of quality in dyadic interviews.? Language and Communication 13:195?217. · DOI
  17. Grimshaw, Allen D., ed. 1990 Conflict Talk. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  18. Hargens, Lowell andWarren O. Hagstrom 1982 ?Scientific consensus and academic status attainment patterns.? Sociology of Education 40:24?38. · DOI
  19. Ho Peng Yoke 1985 Li, Qi, and Shu. An Introduction to Science and Civilization in China. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
  20. Jones, Alexander 1991 ?The adaptation of Babylonian methods in Greek numerical astronomy.? Isis 82:441?453.
  21. Latour, Bruno 1987 Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  22. Latour, Bruno 1988 The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  23. Leydesdorff, Loet andOlga Amsterdamska 1990 ?Dimensions of citation analysis.? Science, Technology and Human Values 15:305?335. · DOI
  24. Lipset, Seymour Martin 1960 Political Man. New York: Doubleday.
  25. Moore, Barrington, Jr. 1966 Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Boston: Beacon Press.
  26. Morell, Virginia 1993 ?Anthropology: Nature-culture battleground.? Science 261(24 September):1798?1802. · DOI
  27. Mulkay, Michael 1985 The Word and the World. London: Allen and Unwin.
  28. Needham, Joseph 1959 Science and Civilization in China, Vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  29. Neugebauer, O. 1957 The Exact Sciences in Antiquity. New York: Dover.
  30. Paige, Jeffery 1975 Agrarian Revolution. New York: Free Press.
  31. Price, Derek J. de Solla 1986 Little Science, Big Science, and Beyond. (1961). New York: Columbia University Press.
  32. Rosenberg, Alexander 1992 Economics: Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  33. Shapin, Steven andSimon Schaffer 1985 Leviathan and the Air-Pump. Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  34. Sivin, Nathan 1969 Cosmos and Computation in Early Chinese Mathematical Astronomy. Leiden: Brill.
  35. Turner, Stephen P. andJonathan R. Turner 1990 The Impossible Science. An Institutional Analysis of American Sociology. Newbury Park, CA.: Sage.
  36. Welch, Holmes andAnna Seidel 1979 Facets of Taoism. Essays in Chinese Religion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  37. Willer, David 1987 Theory and the Experimental Investigation of Social Structures. New York: Gordon & Breach.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 126

Metadata

Authors
Collins, R.
Venue
Sociological Forum
Published
1994-06
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
155-177
ISSN
  • 0884-8971
  • 1573-7861
Cited by
126
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review