The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biofilms in device-related infections
Open accessAbstract
The use of various medical devices including indwelling vascular catheters, cardiac pacemakers, prosthetic heart valves, chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis catheters and prosthetic joints has greatly facilitated the management of serious medical and surgical illness. However, the successful development of synthetic materials and introduction of these artificial devices into various body systems has been accompanied by the ability of microorganism to adhere to these devices in the environment of biofilms that protect them from the activity of antimicrobial agents and from host defense mechanisms. A number of host, biomaterial and microbial factors are unique to the initiation, persistence and treatment failures of device-related infections. Intravascular catheters are the most common devices used in clinical practice and interactions associated with these devices are the leading cause of nosocomial bacteremias. The infections associated with these devices include insertion site infection, septic thrombophlebitis, septicemia, endocarditis and metastatic abscesses. Other important device-related infections include infections of vascular prostheses, intracardiac prostheses, total artificial hearts, indwelling urinary catheters, orthopedic prostheses, endotracheal tubes and extended wear lenses. The diagnosis and management of biofilm-associated infections remain difficult but critical issues. Appropriate antimicrobial therapy is often not effective in eradicating these infections and the removal of the device becomes necessary. Several improved diagnostic and therapeutic modalities have been reported in recent experimental studies. The clinical usefulness of these strategies remains to be determined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microbial Biofilms: from Ecology to Molecular Genetics
Davey, M. E., & O'toole, G. A. (2000) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.64.4.847-867.2000 · Cited by 3,086
Anderl, J. N., Franklin, M. J., & Stewart, P. S. (2000) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.44.7.1818-1824.2000 · Cited by 958
Ramage, G., Saville, S. P., Thomas, D. P., & López-Ribot, J. L. (2005) · Eukaryotic Cell · doi:10.1128/ec.4.4.633-638.2005 · Cited by 678
Candida biofilms on implanted biomaterials: a clinically significant problem
Ramage, G., MartÃnez, J. P., & López-Ribot, J. L. (2006) · FEMS Yeast Research · doi:10.1111/j.1567-1364.2006.00117.x · Cited by 575
Drug/device combinations for local drug therapies and infection prophylaxis
Wu, P., & Grainger, D. W. (2006) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.031 · Cited by 491
Biofilms: Understanding the structure and contribution towards bacterial resistance in antibiotics
Shree, P., Singh, C. K., Sodhi, K. K., Surya, J. N., & Singh, D. K. (2023) · Medicine in Microecology · doi:10.1016/j.medmic.2023.100084 · Cited by 396
Park, S.-C., Park, Y., & Hahm, K.-S. (2011) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms12095971 · Cited by 327
The Complex Relationship between Virulence and Antibiotic Resistance
Schroeder, M., Brooks, B., & Brooks, A. (2017) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes8010039 · Cited by 304
Barraud, N., Storey, M. V., Moore, Z. P., Webb, J. S., Rice, S. A., & Kjelleberg, S. (2009) · Microbial Biotechnology · doi:10.1111/j.1751-7915.2009.00098.x · Cited by 289
Das, T., Sehar, S., & Manefield, M. (2013) · Environmental Microbiology Reports · doi:10.1111/1758-2229.12085 · Cited by 274
The Role of Bacterial Biofilms in Device-Associated Infection
Deva, A. K., Adams, W. P., & Vickery, K. (2013) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e3182a3c105 · Cited by 258
Oosterhof, J. J. H., Buijssen, K. J. D. A., Busscher, H. J., van der Laan, B. F. A. M., & van der Mei, H. C. (2006) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.72.5.3673-3677.2006 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Khardori, N., & Yassien, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Industrial Microbiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-09
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 141-147
- ISSN
- 1367-5435 (ISSN-L)
- 0169-4146
- 1476-5535
- OpenAlex
- W2041959868
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.