The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ion efflux systems involved in bacterial metal resistances
Open accessAbstract
Studying metal ion resistance gives us important insights into environmental processes and provides an understanding of basic living processes. This review concentrates on bacterial efflux systems for inorganic metal cations and anions, which have generally been found as resistance systems from bacteria isolated from metal-polluted environments. The protein products of the genes involved are sometimes prototypes of new families of proteins or of important new branches of known families. Sometimes, a group of related proteins (and presumedly the underlying physiological function) has still to be defined. For example, the efflux of the inorganic metal anion arsenite is mediated by a membrane protein which functions alone in Gram-positive bacteria, but which requires an additional ATPase subunit in some Gram-negative bacteria. Resistance to Cd2+ and Zn2+ in Gram-positive bacteria is the result of a P-type efflux ATPase which is related to the copper transport P-type ATPases of bacteria and humans (defective in the human hereditary diseases Menkes' syndrome and Wilson's disease). In contrast, resistance to Zn2+, Ni2+, Co2+ and Cd2+ in Gram-negative bacteria is based on the action of proton-cation antiporters, members of a newly-recognized protein family that has been implicated in diverse functions such as metal resistance/nodulation of legumes/cell division (therefore, the family is called RND). Another new protein family, named CDF for 'cation diffusion facilitator' has as prototype the protein CzcD, which is a regulatory component of a cobalt-zinc-cadmium resistance determinant in the Gram-negative bacterium Alcaligenes eutrophus. A family for the ChrA chromate resistance system in Gram-negative bacteria has still to be defined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nucifora, G., Chu, L., Misra, T. K., & Silver, S. (1989) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.86.10.3544 · Cited by 359
Self-citation
Cited by
Antiseptics and Disinfectants: Activity, Action, and Resistance
McDonnell, G., & Russell, A. D. (1999) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.12.1.147 · Cited by 4,780
Metals, minerals and microbes: geomicrobiology and bioremediation
Gadd, G. M. (2010) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.037143-0 · Cited by 2,013
Microbial Resistance to Metals in the Environment
Bruins, M. R., Kapil, S., & Oehme, F. W. (2000) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1006/eesa.1999.1860 · Cited by 1,445
Bacterial silver resistance: molecular biology and uses and misuses of silver compounds
Silver, S. (2003) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0168-6445(03)00047-0 · Cited by 1,312
Self-citationPhylogenetic Relationships within Cation Transporter Families of Arabidopsis
Mäser, P., Thomine, S., Schroeder, J. I., Ward, J. M., Hirschi, K., Sze, H., Talke, I. N., Amtmann, A., Maathuis, F. J. M., Sanders, D., et al. (2001) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.126.4.1646 · Cited by 1,257
Metadata
- Authors
- Nies, D. H., & Silver, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Industrial Microbiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-02
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 186-199
- ISSN
- 1367-5435 (ISSN-L)
- 0169-4146
- 1476-5535
- OpenAlex
- W2007266049
- Cited by
- 548
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.