CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3,138

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds: I. Theoretical development

Fretwell, Stephen Dewitt, Lucas, Henry L.·1969·Acta Biotheoretica
DOI 10.1007/bf01601953
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01601953

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fretwell and Lucas (1969) outlined a model of habitat selection with three variants: the ideal free distribution, the ideal free distribution with an Allee effect, and the ideal dominance distribution (later known as the ideal despotic distribution).

    “Fretwell and Lucas (1969) outline a model of habitat selection with three variants: the ideal free distribution, the ideal free distribution with an Allee effect, and the ideal dominance distribution (later known as the ideal despotic distribution).”

    From The Ideal Distribution Model and Archaeological Settlement Patterning (2022) · cites this paper as Fretwell and Lucas 1969

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Allee, W. C., A. E. Emerson, O. Park, T. Park &K. P. Schmidt (1949). Principles of Animal Ecology. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, xii + 837 pp.
  2. Brown, J. L. (1964). The evolution of diversity in avian territorial systems. - Wilson Bull., 76, 160–169.
  3. Gibb, J. (1961). Bird populations, pp. 413–446. In:A. J. Marshall (ed.), Biology and Comparative Physiology of Birds. II. Academic Press, New York. · DOI
  4. Howard, F. (1920). Territory in Bird Life. Atheneum, London, 239 pp.
  5. Huxley, J. S. (1934). A natural experiment on the territorial instinct. - Brit. Birds, 27, 270–277.
  6. Johnston, R. F. (1961). Population movements of birds. - Condor, 63, 386–388. · DOI
  7. Kluyver, H. N. &L. Tinbergen (1953). Territory and the regulation of density in titmice. - Arch. Neerl. Zool, 10, 265–289. · DOI
  8. Lack, D. (1954). The natural regulation of animal numbers. Clarendon Press, Oxford, viii + 343 pp.
  9. — (1964). A long term study of the great tit (Parus major). - J. Anim. Ecol., 33 (Suppl.), 159–173. · DOI
  10. — (1966). Population Studies of Birds. Clarendon Press, Oxford. 341 pp.
  11. Nice, Margaret M. (1937). Studies in the life history of the Song Sparrow I. - Trans. Linn. Soc., N. Y., viii + 246 pp.
  12. Sabine, Winifred (1955). The winter society of the Oregon Junco: the flock. - Condor, 57, 88–110. · DOI
  13. Stewart, R. E. &J. W. Aldrich (1951). Removal and repopulation of breeding birds in a spruce-fir forest community. - Auk, 68, 471–482. · DOI
  14. Tinbergen, N. (1957). The functions of territory. - Bird Study, 4, 14–27. · DOI
  15. Wynne Edwards, V. C. (1962). Animal Dispersion in Relation to Social Behavior. Hafner Publishing Company, New York. xi + 653 pp.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fretwell, S. D., & Lucas, H. L.
Venue
Acta Biotheoretica
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1969-03
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
16-36
ISSN
  • 0001-5342
  • 1572-8358
DOI
10.1007/bf01601953
Cited by
3,138
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review