Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 565

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: Experience with liver resection and transplantation in 198 patients

Ringe, Burckhardt, Pichlmayr, Rudolf, Wittekind, Christian, Tusch, Günter·1991·World Journal of Surgery

Abstract

Surgical therapy offers the only chance for long‐term cure of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. The role of partial and total hepatectomy with subsequent liver replacement was analyzed in a consecutive series of 198 patients. It was the aim of this study to compare both treatment modalities on the basis of various clinicopathological prognostic factors including the TNM system of pathological classification. One hundred thirty‐one resections and 61 transplantations were performed for the following histological diagnoses: hepatocellular carcinoma without coexisting liver disease (86) or associated with various hepatic abnormalities (79), fibrolamellar carcinoma (19), and mixed hepatocholangiocellular carcinoma (8). Overall actuarial survival rates at 5 years were 35.8% following resection and 15.2% after transplantation, respectively. For partial hepatectomy, factors significantly associated with improved long‐term outcome were: age 30–50 years, hepatocellular carcinoma without coexisting liver disease, fibrolamellar carcinoma, solitary tumor, unilobar location, absence of vascular invasion, portal vein thrombosis or extrahepatic spread, primary tumor categories pT 2/3, stage groups II/III, and curative operation (R0). Regarding total hepatectomy, the corresponding figures were: pT2, absence of portal vein thrombosis or extrahepatic spread (negative regional lymph nodes, no distant metastases), stage group II, and curative surgery. It could be clearly shown by uni‐ and multivariate analyses that the pTNM classification is of clinical value regarding the assessment of prognostic significance after resection and transplantation. A group of 13 patients had secondary resection (8) or transplantation (6) for intrahepatic tumor recurrence. Whereas in all resected patients cancer recurred again, 5 of 6 transplant recipients are alive and disease‐free at 12–40 months. The results of this study demonstrate that liver resection is the treatment of choice for primary liver cancer while transplantation may be indicated, especially in cases of nonresectable or recurrent lesions. Thus, the therapeutic spectrum for hepatocellular carcinoma should include both partial and total hepatectomy, being integrated into one common concept.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01659064

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 565

Metadata

Authors
Ringe, B., Pichlmayr, R., Wittekind, C., & Tusch, G.
Venue
World Journal of Surgery
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-03
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
270-285
ISSN
  • 0364-2313 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2323
OpenAlex
W2086936353
Cited by
565
References
19
FWCI
12.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.