Cited by 72Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesOcular Infections and Treatments

Fluconazole treatment of neonates and infants with severe fungal infections not treatable with conventional agents

Fasano, C., O'Keeffe, J., Gibbs, D.·1994·European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Fluconazole was evaluated prospectively in 40 neonates and infants between the ages of 2 days and 3 months in whom conventional antifungal therapy was ineffective or contraindicated. The patients received therapy on an individual compassionate request basis for microbiologically documented or presumed fungal infection. The mean fluconazole dosage was 5.3 mg/kg/day (range 1-16 mg/kg/day) and the mean duration of therapy was 26 days (range 2-80 days). Efficacy was evaluated in neonates with proven fungal infection as documented by the presence of a pathogen at baseline. A positive clinical response was achieved in 97% (31/32) of the clinically evaluable patients; eradication of the fungal organism was achieved in 97% (30/31) of evaluable patients. Adverse events occurred in two patients (5%); therapy was not discontinued in either patient. These favorable safety and efficacy data are similar to results obtained with fluconazole in older children and adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01974619

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A dosage of fluconazole 5 mg/kg per day has been used safely and successfully in infants with low or very low birth weight treated for disseminated candidiasis.

    “A dosage of 5 mg/kg per day has been used safely and successfully in this population [94].”

    From Guidelines for Treatment of Candidiasis (2004) · cites this paper as [94]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fasano, C., O'Keeffe, J., & Gibbs, D.
Affiliations
Pfizer (United States) (US)
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
Published
1994-04
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
351-354
ISSN
  • 0934-9723 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-4373
OpenAlex
W2021371083
Cited by
72
References
8
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Infections and Treatments
Keywords
fluconazole, neonatal fungal infection, antifungal therapy, treatment efficacy, drug safety, adverse events, compassionate use
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Body Weight, Candida, Candidiasis, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Low Birth Weight, Infant, Newborn, Male, Mycoses, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Fluconazole

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review