A coword analysis of scientometrics

Courtial, J. P.·1994·Scientometrics

DOI 10.1007/bf02016875

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02016875

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002 · Cited by 2,733
Mapping knowledge structure by keyword co-occurrence: a first look at journal papers in Technology Foresight
Su, H.-N., & Lee, P.-C. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0259-8 · Cited by 916
Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis
Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G. G., & Foo, S. (2001) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/s0306-4573(00)00051-0 · Cited by 882
Software engineering as seen through its research literature: A study in co-word analysis
Coulter, N., Monarch, I., & Konda, S. (1998) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(1998)49:13<1206::aid-asi7>3.0.co;2-f · Cited by 473
Conceptual structure and perspectives on entrepreneurship education research: A bibliometric review
Aparicio, G., Iturralde, T., & Maseda, A. (2019) · European Research on Management and Business Economics · doi:10.1016/j.iedeen.2019.04.003 · Cited by 285
Thirty years of research in family business journals: Status quo and future directions
Rovelli, P., Ferasso, M., De Massis, A., & Kraus, S. (2022) · Journal of Family Business Strategy · doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2021.100422 · Cited by 283
Socio-Environmental Impacts of Lithium Mineral Extraction: Towards a Research Agenda
Agusdinata, D. B., Liu, W., Eakin, H., & Romero, H. (2018) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aae9b1 · Cited by 284
Mapping research specialties
Morris, S. A., & Van der Veer Martens, B. (2008) · Annual Review of Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/aris.2008.1440420113 · Cited by 280
Highly tweeted science articles: who tweets them? An analysis of Twitter user profile descriptions
Vainio, J., & Holmberg, K. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2368-0 · Cited by 63

Authors: Courtial, J. P.
Venue: Scientometrics
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 1994-11
Volume: 31
Issue: 3
Pages: 251-260
ISSN: 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
1588-2861
DOI: 10.1007/bf02016875
OpenAlex: W1985690616
Cited by: 172
References: 0
FWCI: 0.58
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review