The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Origin of tetrapods inferred from their mitochondrial DNA affiliation to lungfish
Open accessAbstract
SummaryThis paper shows that questions of an unexpected phylogenetic depth can be addressed by the study of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences. For decades, it has been unclear whether coelacanth fishes or lungfishes are the closest living relatives of land vertebrates (Tetrapoda). Segments of mtDNA from a lungfish, the coelacanth, and a ray-finned fish were sequenced and compared to the published sequence of a frog mtDNA. A tree based on inferred amino acid replacements, silent transversions, and ribosomal RNA (rRNA) substitutions showed with statistical confidence that the lungfish mtDNA is more closely related to that of the frog than is the mtDNA of the coelacanth. This result appears to rule out the possibility that the coelacanth lineage gave rise to land vertebrates; hence, morphological characters that link the latter two groups are possibly due to convergent evolution or reversals and not to common descent. Besides supporting the theory that land vertebrates arose from an offshoot of the lineage leading to lungfishes, the molecular tree facilitates an evolutionary interpretation of the morphological differences among the living forms. It would appear that the common ancestor of lungfishes and tetrapods already possessed multiple morphological traits preadapting their locomotion, circulation, and respiration for life on land.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1986) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040379 · Cited by 210
Cited by
Ribosomal DNA: Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetic Inference
Hillis, D. M., & Dixon, M. T. (1991) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/417338 · Cited by 2,573
Evolution of the cytochromeb gene of mammals
Irwin, D. M., Kocher, T. D., & Wilson, A. C. (1991) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf02515385 · Cited by 2,315
Self-citationSignal, Noise, and Reliability in Molecular Phylogenetic Analyses
Hillis, D. M., & Huelsenbeck, J. P. (1992) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111190 · Cited by 1,287
Zardoya, R., & Meyer, A. (1996) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025661 · Cited by 447
Self-citation(1992) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040725 · Cited by 431
Metadata
- Authors
- Meyer, A., & Wilson, A. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Evolution
- Published
- 1990-11
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 359-364
- ISSN
- 0022-2844 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1432
- OpenAlex
- W2137260316
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Origin of tetrapods inferred from their mitochondrial DNA affiliation to lungfish. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf02106050
- The paper
- Meyer, A., & Wilson, A. C. (1990). Origin of tetrapods inferred from their mitochondrial DNA affiliation to lungfish. Journal of Molecular Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02106050
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.