Cited by 503scientometrics and bibliometrics researchWeb visibility and informetricsPsychology Research and Bibliometrics

Problems of citation analysis

MacRoberts, M. H., MacRoberts, Barbara R.·1996·Scientometrics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02129604

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Citation characteristics of methodology articles, review articles, research articles, letters, and notes as well as articles, chapters, and books differ considerably.

    “Citation characteristics of methodology articles, review articles, research articles, letters, and notes (Shaw, 1987; Cano and Lind, 1991; MacRoberts and MacRoberts, 1996) as well as articles, chapters, and books (Bott and Hargens, 1991) differ considerably.”

    From What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008) · cites this paper as MacRoberts and MacRoberts, 1996

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R.
Venue
Scientometrics
Published
1996-07
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
435-444
ISSN
  • 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
  • 1588-2861
OpenAlex
W1969666528
Cited by
503
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 23
FWCI
10.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Scientometrics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Keywords
citation analysis, bibliometric analysis, citation indexes, research evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review