CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 14Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research Topics

Symptom and substance use reporting consistency over two years for offspring at high and low risk for depression

Fendrich, Michael, Warner, Virginia·1994·Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
DOI 10.1007/bf02168083
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We examined 2-year recall of reports of lifetime symptomatology and substance use questions on the K-SADS-E in a sample of offspring at high and low risk for depression. Comparisons were made between those who forgot and those who remembered reports of screening symptoms made at the initial interview. In general, recall for symptoms of internalizing disorders (depression and anxiety disorder) was much worse than recall for symptoms of externalizing disorders (conduct disorder and substance use). Less than two-thirds of those initially meeting the lifetime depression screening criteria provided reports which met the lifetime screening criteria at followup. Significant correlates of screening criteria recall included the following variables (measured at the initial interview): history of treatment for any disorder, impairment on the GAS (a score less than 61), and the presence of hypersomnia and suicidal symptoms (thoughts or ideation). Logistic regression suggested that a prior report of suicidal symptoms (including thoughts, ideation, or behavior) was the most important correlate of screen recall.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02168083

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Fendrich, M., & Warner, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
ORCID
Fendrich, Michael
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1994-08
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
425-439
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2835
DOI
10.1007/bf02168083
OpenAlex
W2053093426
Cited by
14
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p50mh043878-04, 5r29da007995-03)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH43878-03)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R29DA07995)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
depression screening, substance use, internalizing disorders, externalizing disorders, conduct disorder, suicidal ideation, hypersomnia, child and adolescent psychopathology
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Depressive Disorder, Family, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Mental Recall, Sleep Wake Disorders, Suicide, Reproducibility of Results, Comorbidity, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review