Cited by 68Memory Processes and InfluencesNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudySmoking Behavior and Cessation

Facilitation of memory by post-trial administration of nicotine: evidence for an attentional explanation

Rusted, Jennifer M., Warburton, David M.·1992·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

In human studies, reported performance improvements with post-trial administration of nicotine have all involved associative learning (Mangan and Golding 1983; Colrain et al. 1992; Warburton et al. 1992). In this study, post-trial nicotine, obtained through smoking a cigarette, improved free recall of lists of unrelated words under conditions which limited the opportunity for associative learning. However, the nicotine-induced advantage was not observed when volunteers were required to complete a secondary (attention) task during the post-trial period in which they smoked. The results suggest that post-trial effects depend on the opportunity for stimulus processing after input, and that nicotine improves performance by increasing the attentional resources available for such strategic processing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02247420

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some individuals report smoking to improve attention, and smoking's ability to improve attentional function in individuals with schizophrenia likely contributes to their high rates of smoking.

    “Some individuals report that they smoke to improve attention (Rusted and Warburton 1992;Warburton et al. 1992), and the ability of smoking to improve attentional function in individuals with schizophrenia (George et al. 2002) is likely to contribute to their extremely high rates of smoking.”

    From Mechanisms of Nicotine Addiction (2021) · cites this paper as Rusted and Warburton 1992

  • Nicotine and nicotinic drugs can improve attention in control subjects.

    “nicotine and nicotinic drugs can improve attention in control subjects (Rusted and Warburton 1992)”

    From Mechanisms of Nicotine Addiction (2021) · cites this paper as Rusted and Warburton 1992

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rusted, J. M., & Warburton, D. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Sussex (GB)
  • University of Reading (GB)
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
1992-09
Volume
108
Issue
4
Pages
452-455
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W1988952379
Cited by
68
References
1
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
nicotine, memory enhancement, free recall, attention, associative learning, cigarette smoking, secondary task interference, strategic processing, attentional resources
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Nicotine, Mental Recall, Smoking, Task Performance and Analysis, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review