The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Some Mathematical Notes on Three-Mode Factor Analysis
Abstract
The model for three-mode factor analysis is discussed in terms of newer applications of mathematical processes including a type of matrix process termed the Kronecker product and the definition of combination variables. Three methods of analysis to a type of extension of principal components analysis are discussed. Methods II and III are applicable to analysis of data collected for a large sample of individuals. An extension of the model is described in which allowance is made for unique variance for each combination variable when the data are collected for a large sample of individuals.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tucker decomposition is a more generalized tensor decomposition technique and CP decomposition is its special case.
“Typically, Tucker decomposition is regarded as a more generalized tensor decomposition technique and CP decomposition is its special case.”
From Temporal Knowledge Graph Completion: A Survey (2023) · cites this paper as Tucker, 1966
Citations
Cites
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Tucker, 1963, Problems in measuring change, 122
- 10.1037/h0022603 · DOI
- Bellman, 1960, Introduction to matrix analysis
- MacDuffee, 1946, The theory of matrices
- Osgood, 1957, The measurement of meaning
- Tucker, 1964, Contributions to mathematical psychology, 109
- Tucker, 1965, Proceedings of the 1964 Invitational Conference on Testing Problems, 46
- 10.1007/BF02288367 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Image Classification: A Comprehensive Review
Rawat, W., & Wang, Z. (2017) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_00990 · Cited by 3,503
Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications.
Thompson, B. (2004) · doi:10.1037/10694-000 · Cited by 3,469
Knowledge Graph Embedding: A Survey of Approaches and Applications
Wang, Q., Mao, Z., Wang, B., & Guo, L. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2017.2754499 · Cited by 2,654
Multimodal Data Fusion: An Overview of Methods, Challenges, and Prospects
Lahat, D., Adali, T., & Jutten, C. (2015) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2015.2460697 · Cited by 1,296
Ghamisi, P., Yokoya, N., Li, J., Liao, W., Liu, S., Plaza, J., Rasti, B., & Plaza, A. (2017) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine · doi:10.1109/mgrs.2017.2762087 · Cited by 909
Bordes, A., Glorot, X., Weston, J., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-013-5363-6 · Cited by 675
TuckER: Tensor Factorization for Knowledge Graph Completion
Balazevic, I., Allen, C., & Hospedales, T. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1522 · Cited by 696
Multimodal intelligence: Representation learning, information fusion, and applications
Zhang, C., Yang, Z., He, X., & Deng, L. (2020) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2020.2987728 · Cited by 511
MobileDets: Searching for Object Detection Architectures for Mobile Accelerators
Xiong, Y., Liu, H., Gupta, S., Akin, B., Bender, G., Wang, Y., Kindermans, P.-J., Tan, M., Singh, V., & Chen, B. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00382 · Cited by 193
Temporal Knowledge Graph Completion: A Survey
Cai, B., Xiang, Y., Gao, L., Zhang, H., Li, Y., & Li, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2023/734 · Cited by 133
NTIRE 2023 Challenge on Efficient Super-Resolution: Methods and Results
Li, Y., Zhang, Y., Timofte, R., Van Gool, L., Yu, L., Li, Y., Li, X., Jiang, T., Wu, Q., Han, M., et al. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw59228.2023.00189 · Cited by 72
A Survey on Temporal Knowledge Graph: Representation Learning and Applications
Cai, L., Mao, X., Zhou, Y., Long, Z., Wu, C., & Lan, M. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.04782 · Cited by 68
Multiplicative models for interaction in three-way ANOVA, with applications to plant breeding
van Eeuwijk, F. A., & Kroonenberg, P. M. (1998) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533660 · Cited by 51
Decomposition Methods for Machine Learning with Small, Incomplete or Noisy Datasets
Caiafa, C. F., Solé-Casals, J., Marti-Puig, P., Zhe, S., & Tanaka, T. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10238481 · Cited by 33
Miyoshi, T., Tanioka, K., Yamamoto, S., Yadohisa, H., Hiroyasu, T., & Hiwa, S. (2020) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2019.00473 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Tucker, L. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois
- Venue
- Psychometrika
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1966-09
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 279-311
- ISSN
- 0033-3123
- 1860-0980
- Cited by
- 3,492
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review