CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 70Advanced Graph Neural NetworksTopic ModelingRecommender Systems and Techniques

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 79 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

A Survey on Temporal Knowledge Graph: Representation Learning and Applications

Open access
Cai, Li, Mao, Xin, Zhou, Yuhao, Long, Zhaoguang, Wu, Changxu, Lan, Man·2024·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2403.04782arXiv 2403.04782
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Knowledge graphs have garnered significant research attention and are widely used to enhance downstream applications. However, most current studies mainly focus on static knowledge graphs, whose facts do not change with time, and disregard their dynamic evolution over time. As a result, temporal knowledge graphs have attracted more attention because a large amount of structured knowledge exists only within a specific period. Knowledge graph representation learning aims to learn low-dimensional vector embeddings for entities and relations in a knowledge graph. The representation learning of temporal knowledge graphs incorporates time information into the standard knowledge graph framework and can model the dynamics of entities and relations over time. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive survey of temporal knowledge graph representation learning and its applications. We begin with an introduction to the definitions, datasets, and evaluation metrics for temporal knowledge graph representation learning. Next, we propose a taxonomy based on the core technologies of temporal knowledge graph representation learning methods, and provide an in-depth analysis of different methods in each category. Finally, we present various downstream applications related to the temporal knowledge graphs. In the end, we conclude the paper and have an outlook on the future research directions in this area.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This survey reviews temporal knowledge graph representation learning (TKGRL), which extends standard KG embeddings with timestamps to model how entities and relations evolve over time. It proposes a taxonomy of ten method categories, summarizes datasets and evaluation metrics, and surveys downstream applications and future directions.

Key findings

  • The paper proposes a taxonomy dividing TKGRL methods into ten categories: transformation-based, decomposition-based, graph neural networks-based, capsule network-based, autoregression-based, temporal point process-based, interpretability-based, language model, few-shot learning, and other methods.
  • Four commonly used TKG datasets are identified — ICEWS (subsets ICEWS14, ICEWS05-15, ICEWS18), GDELT, Wikidata, and YAGO — with reported statistics such as ICEWS18 containing 23,033 entities, 256 relations, 304 timestamps, and 468,558 facts, and GDELT containing 2,278,405 facts.
  • Evaluation metrics for TKGRL are MRR (mean reciprocal rank) and Hit@k, typically with k = 1, 3, 5, or 10.
  • Downstream applications covered are temporal knowledge graph reasoning (entity, relation, and time prediction, split into interpolation/TKGC and extrapolation/forecasting), entity alignment between TKGs, and question answering over TKGs.
  • Future directions highlighted are scalability, interpretability, information fusion (e.g., textual/multi-modal features), and integration of large language models.

Methods

  • Design: a literature survey. The authors state that no comprehensive survey on TKGRL existed previously, and position their work against earlier surveys (Ji et al. on KGs, Mo et al. on TKGs, Cai et al. on TKGC) that they argue cover only limited TKGRL methods.
  • Data: no new experiments; the paper reviews existing datasets, evaluation metrics, and published methods, presenting a summary table (Table 3) of each method's representation space, encoder, and decoder.
  • Analysis: qualitative categorization and comparison of methods by core technology, with descriptions of representative models (e.g., TTransE, HyTE, Tero, ChronoR, DE-SimplE, TComplEx, TuckERT, TEA-GNN, RE-NET, RE-GCN, TiRGN, Know-Evolve, GHNN, EvoKG, xERTE, CluSTeR, TITer, ICLTKG, zrLLM, ECOLA, MetaTKG, TR-Match, CygNet, TANGO, BoxTE, TGeomE).

Limitations

  • The paper does not state limitations of the survey itself; it only notes limitations of surveyed methods (e.g., RE-NET "ignoring the structural dependency between all triples in each subgraph"; TLT-KGE "requires a large amount of storage space"; autoregression-based methods "cannot effectively model the facts with irregular time intervals").
  • Evident from the text: the survey reports no quantitative benchmark comparison or meta-analysis of the reviewed methods, so relative performance claims are not empirically synthesized.
  • Evident from the text: the authors note current TKG datasets "are insufficient in size compared to real-world knowledge graphs," which constrains the generalizability of the reviewed methods.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2403.04782

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 79 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisecitation

    ECOLA proposes a joint learning model by leveraging text knowledge to enhance temporal knowledge graph representations.

    “ECOLA [25] proposes a joint learning model by leveraging text knowledge to enhance temporal knowledge graph representations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [25]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Premisecitation

    TR-Match constructs three new datasets, namely ICEWS14-few, ICEWS05-15-few, and ICEWS18-few, based on existing TKG datasets.

    “To address the challenge posed by few relations in temporal knowledge graphs, three new datasets, namely ICEWS14-few, ICEWS05-15-few, and ICEWS18-few, are constructed based on existing TKG datasets.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Premisecitation

    GHNN solves the problem that Know-Evolve could not deal with co-occurrence facts.

    “Firstly, it solves the problem that Know-Evolve could not deal with co-occurrence facts and uses a neighborhood aggregation module to process multiple facts of entities co-occurring.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [27]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Premisecitation

    ECOLA constructs three new datasets that contain fact description information.

    “As existing TKGs often lack fact description information, the authors construct three new datasets that contain such information.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [25]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Premisecitation

    ICLTKG introduces a novel TKG forecasting approach that leverages large language models through in-context learning to capture and utilize irregular patterns of historical facts for accurate predictions.

    “ICLTKG [41] introduces a novel TKG forecasting approach that leverages large language models (LLMs) through in-context learning (ICL) [5] to efficiently capture and utilize irregular patterns of historical facts for accurate predictions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [41]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [5]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 65
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 42

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    TuckERT is fully expressive and effective for temporal knowledge graph completion.

    “The model is fully expressive and effective for temporal knowledge graph completion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [64]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    Experimental results indicate that the TLT-KGE model in hypercomplex space achieves state-of-the-art results, but it also requires a large amount of storage space.

    “Experimental results indicate that the model in hypercomplex space achieves state-of-the-art results, but it also requires a large amount of storage space.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [83]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Findingnone given

    Several methods have been proposed for Temporal Knowledge Graph Completion (TKGC), including transformation-based, decomposition-based, graph neural networks-based, capsule network-based, and other geometric methods.

    “Several methods have been proposed for Temporal Knowledge Graph Completion (TKGC) including transformation-based, decomposition-based, graph neural networks-based, capsule Network-based, and other geometric methods.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Findingnone given

    Autoregression-based, temporal point process-based, and few-shot learning methods are commonly used for predicting future facts in TKGs.

    “Autoregression-based, temporal point process-based, and few-shot learning methods are commonly used for this task.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Findingreasoning

    Interpretability-based methods are used to increase the reliability of prediction results.

    “Interpretability-based methods are used to increase the reliability of prediction results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Findingnone given

    These techniques aim to address the problem of missing facts in TKGs by leveraging various mathematical models and neural networks.

    “These techniques aim to address the problem of missing facts in TKGs by leveraging various mathematical models and neural networks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given

    The representation learning of temporal knowledge graphs incorporates time information into the standard knowledge graph framework and can model the dynamics of entities and relations over time.

    “The representation learning of temporal knowledge graphs incorporates time information into the standard knowledge graph framework and can model the dynamics of entities and relations over time.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Wikidata and YOGO2 add temporal information to facts, and some event knowledge graphs contain timestamps indicating when events occurred.

    “In order to represent KGs more accurately, Wikidata [73] and YOGO2 [32] add temporal information to the facts, and some event knowledge graphs [55,42] also contain the timestamps indicating when the events occurred.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [73]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [32]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [55]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [42]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    TiRGN argues that the above methods can only capture the local historical dependence of the adjacent timestamps and cannot fully learn the historical characteristics of the facts.

    “TiRGN [43] argues that the above methods can only capture the local historical dependence of the adjacent timestamps and cannot fully learn the historical characteristics of the facts.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [43]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    The knowledge graph consists of triples and can be represented by an order 3 tensor.

    “The knowledge graph consists of triples and can be represented by an order 3 tensor.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    T 2 TKG is a novel approach that addresses the limitations of existing methods in explicitly capturing intra-time and inter-time latent relations for accurate prediction of future facts in Temporal Knowledge Graphs.

    “T 2 TKG [84], or Latent relations Learning method for Temporal Knowledge Graph reasoning, is a novel approach that addresses the limitations of existing methods in explicitly capturing intra-time and inter-time latent relations for accurate prediction of future facts in Temporal Knowledge Graphs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [84]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    The survey [6] is about temporal knowledge graph completion (TKGC) and focuses solely on the interpolation-based temporal knowledge graph reasoning application.

    “The survey [6] is about temporal knowledge graph completion (TKGC), and it focuses solely on the interpolation-based temporal knowledge graph reasoning application.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    The authors of GenTKG and Chain of History have constructed a bespoke dataset of instructional data, which is utilized to train the language model, resulting in exemplary performance.

    “The authors have constructed a bespoke dataset of instructional data, which is utilized to train the language model, resulting in exemplary performance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [47]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [50]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    GHNN believes that the Hawkes process based on the neural network can effectively capture the influence of past facts on future facts.

    “GHNN [27] believes that the Hawkes process [28] based on the neural network can effectively capture the influence of past facts on future facts, and proposes a graph Hawkes neural network (GHNN).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [27]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [28]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    TR-Match proposes a temporal-relational matching network.

    “To address these issues, the authors propose a temporal-relational matching network.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    EvoKG argues that the above methods based on TPP lack to model the evolving network structure, and the methods based on autoregression lack to model the event time.

    “EvoKG [57] argues that the above methods based on TPP lack to model the evolving network structure, and the methods based on autoregression lack to model the event time.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [57]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisenone given

    The entity can enrich its representation with the attribute feature and the global structure feature by GNN.

    “The entity can enrich its representation with the attribute feature and the global structure feature by GNN.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Cen believes that modeling historical facts with fixed time steps could not discover the complex evolutional patterns that vary in length.

    “Cen [44] believes that modeling historical facts with fixed time steps could not discover the complex evolutional patterns that vary in length.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [44]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisenone given

    Interpretability-based methods aim to provide explanations for the predictions made by models.

    “These methods aim to provide explanations for the predictions made by the models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Graph Neural Networks have powerful structure modeling ability.

    “Graph Neural Networks (GNN) [60] have powerful structure modeling ability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [60]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    RE-NET only models the representations of the specific entity and relation in the query triple, ignoring the structural dependency between all triples in each subgraph, which may lose some important information from the entities not in the query triple.

    “This method only models the representations of the specific entity and relation in the query triple, ignoring the structural dependency between all triples in each subgraph, which may lose some important information from the entities not in the query triple.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    The acquired low-dimensional vector representations are capable of modelling the dynamics of entities and relations over time, thereby improving downstream applications such as time-aware knowledge reasoning, entity alignment, and question answering.

    “The acquired lowdimensional vector representations are capable of modelling the dynamics of entities and relations over time, thereby improving downstream applications such as time-aware knowledge reasoning [34], entity alignment [81], and question answering [59].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [34]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [81]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [59]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Glean thinks that most of the existing representation learning methods use the structural information of TKG, ignoring the unstructured information such as semantic information of words.

    “Glean [14] thinks that most of the existing representation learning methods use the structural information of TKG, ignoring the unstructured information such as semantic information of words.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [14]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Given the historical events before a timestamp, if we can find a conditional intensity function to characterize them, then we can predict whether the events will occur in the future with a conditional density and when the events will occur with an expectation.

    “Given the historical events before a timestamp, if we can find a conditional intensity function to characterize them, then we can Predict whether the events will occur in the future with a conditional density and when the events will occur with an expectation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    MetaTKGR proposes a meta temporal knowledge graph reasoning framework.

    “To address this issue, the authors propose a meta temporal knowledge graph reasonging framework.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [75]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    TR-Match identifies that most relations in TKGs have only a few quadruples, and new relations are added over time.

    “TR-Match [22] identifies that most relations in TKGs have only a few quadruples, and new relations are added over time.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisereasoning

    By modeling the subgraphs recurrently, the autoregression-based methods learn the evolutional representations of entities and relations to infer the facts G T +1 in the future.

    “By modeling the subgraphs recurrently, the autoregression-based methods learn the evolutional representations of entities and relations to infer the facts G T +1 in the future.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    There are four commonly used datasets for temporal knowledge graph representation learning.

    “There are four commonly used datasets for temporal knowledge graph representation learning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    GenTKG and Chain of History apply supervised fine-tuning language models to predict the future based on retrieved historical facts.

    “Subsequently, these frameworks apply supervised fine-tuning language models to predict the future based on the retrieved historical facts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [47]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [50]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    The representation learning methods based on autoregression consider that the above methods cannot model the evolution of the temporal knowledge graph over time, so they cannot predict the knowledge graph in the future.

    “The representation learning methods based on autoregression consider that the above methods cannot model the evolution of the temporal knowledge graph over time, so they cannot predict the knowledge graph in the future.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisenone given

    TKGRL methods can be broadly categorized into transformation-based, decomposition-based, graph neural networks-based, and capsule network-based approaches.

    “These methods can be broadly categorized into transformation-based, decomposition-based, graph neural networks-based, and capsule network-based approaches.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    For question answering tasks, the datasets include temporal knowledge graphs used to search for answers and temporal-related questions.

    “For question answering tasks, the datasets not only include temporal knowledge graphs used to search for answers but also include temporal-related questions (which have not been showed here).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisereasoning

    The representation learning methods based on TPP regard the TKG as a list of events changing continuously with time.

    “The representation learning methods based on TPP regard the TKG as a list of events changing continuously with time and formalize it as (G, O), where G is the initialized TKG at time τ 0 , O is a series of observed events (h, r, t, τ ).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    In knowledge reasoning tasks, datasets are typically divided into training, validation, and test sets based on task type (interpolation and extrapolation).

    “In knowledge reasoning tasks, datasets are typically divided into different training sets, validation sets, and test sets based on task type (interpolation and extrapolation).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    GenTKG and Chain of History adopt retrieval augmented generation method for prediction.

    “Frameworks such as GenTKG [47] and Chain of History [50] adopt retrieval augmented generation method for prediction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [47]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [50]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    TITer directly uses a temporal path-based reinforcement learning model to learn representations of TKG and reason for future facts.

    “TITer [65] directly uses the temporal path-based reinforcement learning model to learn the representations of the TKG and reasons for future facts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [65]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    CluSTeR proposes a two-stage reasoning strategy to predict facts in the future.

    “CluSTeR [45] proposes a two-stage reasoning strategy to predict the facts in the future.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [45]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisenone given

    The evaluation metrics for verifying the performance of TKGRL are MRR and Hit@k.

    “The evaluation metrics for verifying the performance of TKGRL are M RR (mean reciprocal rank) and Hit@k.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisenone given

    Two popular types of interpretability-based methods are subgraph reasoning-based and reinforcement learning-based approaches.

    “Two popular types of such methods are subgraph reasoning-based and reinforcement learning-based approaches.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Existing models are inadequate in addressing the few-shot scenario and may not fully represent the evolving temporal and relational features of entities in TKGs.

    “Existing models are inadequate in addressing the few-shot scenario and may not fully represent the evolving temporal and relational features of entities in TKGs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    Temporal knowledge graphs have additional temporal information, and some methods enhance the representation of entities by a time-aware mechanism.

    “Temporal knowledge graphs have additional temporal information, and some methods enhance the representation of entities by a time-aware mechanism.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    The paper [53] is a survey on TKGs with one section dedicated to introducing representation learning methods of static knowledge graphs, and only five models related to TKGRL are elaborated in detail.

    “The paper [53] is a survey on TKGs, with one section dedicated to introducing representation learning methods of static knowledge graphs, and only five models related to TKGRL are elaborated in detail.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [53]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Ji et al. [33] provides a survey on KGs that includes a section on TKGs, but this section only covers a limited number of early methods related to TKGRL.

    “Ji et al. [33] provides a survey on KGs, which includes a section on TKGs.However, this section only covers a limited number of early methods related to TKGRL.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [33]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisenone given

    In transformation-based methods, timestamps or relations are regarded as the transformation between entities.

    “In the transformation-based method, timestamps or relations are regarded as the transformation between entities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given

    The autoregression-based methods sample the TKG into discrete snapshots according to a fixed time interval, which cannot effectively model the facts with irregular time intervals.

    “The autoregression-based methods sample the TKG into discrete snapshots according to a fixed time interval, which cannot effectively model the facts with irregular time intervals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    Temporal knowledge graphs can be viewed as sequences of snapshots captured at different timestamps or events that occur over continuous time, and can be learned using autoregressive and temporal point process techniques.

    “Additionally, temporal knowledge graphs can be viewed as sequences of snapshots captured at different timestamps or events that occur over continuous time, and can be learned using autoregressive and temporal point process techniques.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    Compared to KGs, TKGs contain additional timestamps, which are taken into account in the construction of TKGRL methods.

    “Compared to KGs, TKGs contain additional timestamps, which are taken into account in the construction of TKGRL methods.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisereasoning

    The datasets of TKGs often require unique data processing methods for different downstream applications.

    “The datasets of TKGs often require unique data processing methods for different downstream applications.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    In the TKG domain, current methodologies employing language models predominantly encompass two distinct approaches: In-Context Learning and Supervised Fine-Tuning.

    “The current methodologies employing language models in the TKG domain predominantly encompass two distinct approaches: In-Context Learning and Supervised Fine-Tuning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning

    Know-Evolve can predict whether and when the event will occur.

    “Thus, it can predict whether and when the event will occur.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [67]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisereasoning

    For the temporal knowledge graph, the additional temporal information can be represented by an order 4 tensor.

    “For the temporal knowledge graph, the additional temporal information can be represented by an order 4 tensor, and each tensor dimension is the head entity, relation, tail entity, and timestamp, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    xERTE proposes an explainable reasoning framework for predicting facts in the future.

    “xERTE [23] is a subgraph reasoning-based method that proposes an explainable reasoning framework for predicting facts in the future.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [23]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The translation-based methods can infer the inverse and composition relation patterns, except the symmetry pattern, because all the symmetry relations will be presented by a 0 vector, so the rotation-based transformation methods appear.

    “The translation-based methods can infer the inverse and composition relation patterns, except the symmetry pattern, because all the symmetry relations will be presented by a 0 vector, so the rotation-based transformation methods appear.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisenone given

    Some TKGRL methods prioritize interpretability, language model, and few-shot learning.

    “Moreover, some methods prioritize interpretability, language model, and few-shot learning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    Tensor decomposition has three applications: dimension reduction, missing data completion, and implicit relation mining, which meet the needs of knowledge graph representation learning.

    “Tensor decomposition has three applications: dimension reduction, missing data completion, and implicit relation mining, which meet the needs of knowledge graph representation learning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    MetaTKG proposes a temporal meta-learning framework to address the issue of new entities appearing in few facts.

    “Therefore, the authors propose a temporal meta-learning framework to address this issue.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [78]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    xERTE is a subgraph reasoning-based method.

    “xERTE [23] is a subgraph reasoning-based method that proposes an explainable reasoning framework for predicting facts in the future.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [23]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    MetaTKG reveals that new entities emerge over time in TKGs, and appear in only a few facts.

    “MetaTKG [78] reveals that new entities emerge over time in TKGs, and appear in only a few facts.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [78]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    ECOLA jointly optimizes the knowledge-text prediction objective and the temporal knowledge embedding objective to improve the representation of TKGs.

    “During model training, they jointly optimize the knowledge-text prediction (KTP) objective and the temporal knowledge embedding (tKE) objective to improve the representation of TKGs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [25]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Few-shot learning deals with the problem of learning new concepts or tasks from only a few examples.

    “Few-shot learning (FSL) [76] is a type of machine learning problems that deals with the problem of learning new concepts or tasks from only a few examples.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [76]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Reinforcement learning is usually modeled as a Markov Decision Process.

    “Reinforcement learning (RL) [35] is usually modeled as a Markov Decision Process (MDP) [4], which includes a specific environment and an agent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [35]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [4]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisereasoning

    In entity alignment tasks, a dataset always includes two temporal knowledge graphs that must be learned simultaneously.

    “In entity alignment tasks, as the same entites in the real world need to be aligned between different KGs, a dataset always includes two temporal knowledge graphs that must be learned simultaneously.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    TGeomE can naturally model temporal relations and enhance the performance of TKGRL models.

    “The proposed TGeomE approach can naturally model temporal relations and enhance the performance of TKGRL models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [80]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Dyernie maps TKGs to a non-Euclidean space and employs Riemannian manifold product to learn evolving entity representations.

    “The transformation models represent TKGs in a Euclidean space, while Dyernie [26] maps the TKGs to a non-Euclidean space and employs Riemannian manifold product to learn evolving entity representations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    Entity alignment aims to find equivalent entities between different KGs, which is important to promote knowledge fusion between multi-source and multi-lingual KGs.

    “Entity alignment (EA) aims to find equivalent entities between different KGs, which is important to promote the knowledge fusion between multi-source and multi-lingual KGs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    CRONKGQA releases a new dataset named CRONQUESTIONS and proposes a model combining representation of TKG and question for TKGQA.

    “CRONKGQA [59] release a new dataset named CRONQUESTIONS and propose a model combining representation of TKG and question for TKGQA.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [59]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    BoxTE builds on the work of BoxE and proposes a flexible and powerful framework that is fully expressive and inductive.

    “BoxTE [52] is an innovative model that builds on the work of BoxE [1] and proposes a flexible and powerful framework that is fully expressive and inductive.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [52]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [1]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    TANGO's novel approach based on ODEs offers a more effective and accurate method for modeling the dynamic evolution of TKGs compared to existing techniques that rely on discrete representation space.

    “TANGO's novel approach based on ODEs offers a more effective and accurate method for modeling the dynamic evolution of TKGs compared to existing techniques that rely on discrete representation space.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [24]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Utilizing entity and relation names, as well as textual descriptions of fact associations, can promote the development of downstream tasks of TKGs.

    “Utilizing entity and relation names, as well as textual descriptions of fact associations, can enrich their representation and promote the development of downstream tasks of TKGs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    STEA identifies that the timestamps in many TKGs are uniform and proposes a simple GNN-based model with a temporal information matching mechanism to enhance entity alignment.

    “STEA [7] identifies that the timestamps in many TKGs are uniform and proposes a simple GNN-based model with a temporal information matching mechanism to enhance EA.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    TSQA argues existing TKGQA methods haven't explored the implicit temporal feature in TKGs and temporal questions.

    “TSQA [63] argues existing TKGQA methods haven't explore the implicit temporal feature in TKGs and temporal questions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [63]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    Predicting future facts in TKGs requires a different approach that can model the temporal evolution of the graph.

    “In contrast, predicting future facts in TKGs requires a different approach that can model the temporal evolution of the graph.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    TSQA proposes a time sensitive question answering model which consists of a time-aware TKG encoder and a time-sensitive question answering module.

    “It proposes a time sensitive question answering model which consists of a time-aware TKG encoder and a time-sensitive question answering module.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [63]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    The methods of entity alignment between TKGs mainly adopt the GNN-based model.

    “The methods of EA between TKGS mainly adopt the GNN-based model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    LLMs have been shown to be highly effective at capturing complex semantic relationships between words and phrases.

    “LLMs have been shown to be highly effective at capturing complex semantic relationships between words and phrases, and they may be able to provide valuable insights into the meaning and context of entities and relations in a knowledge graph.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    STEA offers an effective way of improving entity representation in TKGs and provides a reliable solution for aligning entities over time.

    “Overall, STEA offers an effective way of improving entity representation in TKGs and provides a reliable solution for aligning entities over time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    Question answering over TKG aims to answer temporal natural language questions based on TKG, the answer to the question is entity or timestamp in the TKG, and the reasoning on TKG is more complex than it on KG.

    “Question answering over TKG (TKGQA) aims to answer temporal natural language questions based on TKG, the answer to the question is entity or timestamp in the TKG, and the reasoning on TKG is more complex than it on KG.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    BoxTE enables the model to capture rigid inference patterns and cross-time inference patterns.

    “BoxTE enables the model to capture rigid inference patterns and cross-time inference patterns, thereby making it a powerful tool for TKGRL.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [52]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Semantic augmentation technology can improve the quality and quantity of semantic information of TKGs.

    “To further enhance the performance of TKGRL, semantic augmentation technology can be employed to improve the quality and quantity of semantic information of TKGs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    TANGO contends that existing approaches for modeling TKGs are inadequate in capturing the continuous evolution of TKGs over time due to their reliance on discrete state spaces.

    “TANGO [24] contends that existing approaches for modeling TKGs are inadequate in capturing the continuous evolution of TKGs over time due to their reliance on discrete state spaces.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [24]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    CygNet proposes a time-aware copy-generation model which can predict future facts concerning the known facts.

    “Therefore, it proposes a time-aware copy-generation model which can predict future facts concerning the known facts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [88]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    TGeomE moves beyond the use of complex or hypercomplex spaces for TKGRL and proposes a novel geometric algebra-based embedding approach.

    “TGeomE [80] moves beyond the use of complex or hypercomplex spaces for TKGRL and instead proposes a novel geometric algebra-based embedding approach.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [80]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    MTKGE recognizes that TKGs are subject to the emergence of unseen entities and relations over time.

    “MTKGE [10] recognizes that TKGs are subject to the emergence of unseen entities and relations over time.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning

    The Dyernie method can more effectively capture the relationships between entities in TKGs, resulting in improved performance on TKGRL tasks.

    “By leveraging these additional structural features, the Dyernie method can more effectively capture the relationships between entities in TKGs, resulting in improved performance on TKGRL tasks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    Utilizing entity and relation names, as well as textual descriptions of fact associations, can enrich the representation of TKGs.

    “Utilizing entity and relation names, as well as textual descriptions of fact associations, can enrich their representation and promote the development of downstream tasks of TKGs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Interpretability-based methods provide evidence to support predictions, helping to establish trust and improving the overall quality of predictions made by the model.

    “These techniques provide evidence to support predictions, helping to establish trust and improving the overall quality of predictions made by the model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    CygNet finds that many facts show repeated patterns along the timeline, which indicates that potential knowledge can be learned from historical facts.

    “CygNet [88] finds that many facts show repeated patterns along the timeline, which indicates that potential knowledge can be learned from historical facts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [88]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    TANGO proposes a novel model based on Neural Ordinary Differential Equations.

    “To address this limitation, TANGO proposes a novel model based on Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (NODEs).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [24]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

88 of 88

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most current studies mainly focus on static knowledge graphs, whose facts do not change with time, and disregard their dynamic evolution over time.

    “However, most current studies mainly focus on static knowledge graphs, whose facts do not change with time, and disregard their dynamic evolution over time.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A large amount of structured knowledge exists only within a specific period.

    “As a result, temporal knowledge graphs have attracted more attention because a large amount of structured knowledge exists only within a specific period.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Existing KGs ignore the timestamp indicating when a fact occurred and cannot reflect their dynamic evolution over time.

    “Existing KGs ignore the timestamp indicating when a fact occurred and cannot reflect their dynamic evolution over time.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In TKGs, some entities and relations exist in only a limited number of facts, and new entities and relations emerge over time.

    “In TKGs, some entities and relations are only exist in a limited number of facts, and new entities and relations emerge over time.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The current datasets available for TKG are insufficient in size compared to real-world knowledge graphs.

    “The current datasets available for TKG are insufficient in size compared to real-world knowledge graphs.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    TKGRL methods tend to prioritize improving task-specific performance and often overlook the issue of scalability.

    “Moreover, TKGRL methods tend to prioritize improving task-specific performance and often overlook the issue of scalability.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most TKGRL methods only utilize the structural information of TKGs, with few models incorporating textual information of entities and relations.

    “Most TKGRL methods only utilize the structural information of TKGs, with few models incorporating textual information of entities and relations.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Text data contains rich features that can be leveraged to enhance TKGs' representation.

    “However, text data contains rich features that can be leveraged to enhance TKGs' representation.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Introducing temporal information into knowledge graphs allows TKG to express real-world facts more accurately.

    “By introducing temporal information, TKG can express the facts in the real world more accurately, improve the quality of knowledge graph representation learning, and answer temporal questions more reliably.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Introducing temporal information into knowledge graphs improves the quality of knowledge graph representation learning.

    “By introducing temporal information, TKG can express the facts in the real world more accurately, improve the quality of knowledge graph representation learning, and answer temporal questions more reliably.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Introducing temporal information into knowledge graphs allows TKG to answer temporal questions more reliably.

    “By introducing temporal information, TKG can express the facts in the real world more accurately, improve the quality of knowledge graph representation learning, and answer temporal questions more reliably.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    TKG is helpful for applications such as reasoning, entity alignment, and question answering.

    “It is helpful for the applications such as reasoning, entity alignment, and question answering.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    TKGRL methods are widely used in temporal knowledge graph reasoning tasks.

    “TKGRL methods are widely used in temporal knowledge graph reasoning (TKGR) tasks which automatically infers new facts by learning the existing facts in the KG.”
13 of 13

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Reference [11] is used for both TransE and GRU

    Minor

    The paper cites [11] for TransE and later for gated recurrent units, but reference [11] is a paper on RNN encoder-decoders, not TransE.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Abboud, R., Ceylan, İ. İ., Lukasiewicz, T., Salvatori, T., 2020. Boxe: A box embedding model for knowledge base completion, in: Larochelle, H., Ranzato, M., Hadsell, R., Balcan, M., Lin, H. (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33: Annual Conference on Neu- ral Information Processing Systems 2020, NeurIPS 2020, December 6- 12, 2020, virtual. URL: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/ hash/6dbbe6abe5f14af882ff977fc3f35501-Abstract.html.
  2. Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J.D., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al., 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems 33, 1877-1901.
  3. Cai, L., Mao, X., Ma, M., Yuan, H., Zhu, J., Lan, M., 2022b. A simple temporal information matching mechanism for entity alignment between temporal knowledge graphs, in: Proceedings of the 29th International Con- ference on Computational Linguistics, International Committee on Com- putational Linguistics, Gyeongju, Republic of Korea. pp. 2075-2086. URL: https://aclanthology.org/2022.coling-1.181.
  4. Daley, D.J., Vere-Jones, D., 2008. An Introduction to the The- ory of Point Processes. Volume II: General Theory and Structure. Springer, Berlin, GER. URL: https://link.springer.com/book/10. 1007/978-0-387-49835-5. · DOI
  5. García-Durán, A., Dumancic, S., Niepert, M., 2018. Learning sequence encoders for temporal knowledge graph completion, in: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Process- ing, Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. pp. 4816-4821. URL: https://aclanthology.org/D18-1516, doi:10.18653/ v1/D18-1516. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Gardner, M.W., Dorling, S., 1998. Artificial neural networks (the multi- layer perceptron)-a review of applications in the atmospheric sciences. At- mospheric environment 32, 2627-2636. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/ S1352-2310(97)00447-0. · DOI
  7. Goel, R., Kazemi, S.M., Brubaker, M.A., Poupart, P., 2020. Diachronic embedding for temporal knowledge graph completion, in: The Thirty- Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2020, New York, NY, USA, February 7-12, 2020, AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA, USA. pp. 3988-3995. URL: https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/ view/5815.
  8. Han, Z., Chen, P., Ma, Y., Tresp, V., 2021a. Explainable subgraph reasoning for forecasting on temporal knowledge graphs, in: 9th Inter- national Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2021, Virtual Event, Austria, May 3-7, 2021, OpenReview.net, Austria. URL: https: //openreview.net/forum?id=pGIHq1m7PU.
  9. Hawkes, A.G., 1971. Spectra of some self-exciting and mutually exciting point processes. Biometrika 58, 83-90. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/ biomet/58.1.83. · DOI
  10. Kazemi, S.M., Poole, D., 2018. Simple embedding for link predic- tion in knowledge graphs, in: Bengio, S., Wallach, H., Larochelle, H., Grauman, K., Cesa-Bianchi, N., Garnett, R. (Eds.), Advances in Neu- ral Information Processing Systems, Curran Associates, Inc., New York, NY, USA. URL: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2018/file/ b2ab001909a8a6f04b51920306046ce5-Paper.pdf.
  11. Kipf, T.N., Welling, M., 2017. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks, in: 5th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2017, Toulon, France, April 24-26, 2017, Confer- ence Track Proceedings, OpenReview.net, Toulon, France. URL: https: //openreview.net/forum?id=SJU4ayYgl.
  12. Lacroix, T., Obozinski, G., Usunier, N., 2020. Tensor decompositions for temporal knowledge base completion, in: 8th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2020, OpenReview.net, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. URL: https://openreview.net/forum?id=rke2P1BFwS.
  13. Lee, D.H., Ahrabian, K., Jin, W., Morstatter, F., Pujara, J., 2023. Tempo- ral knowledge graph forecasting without knowledge using in-context learn- ing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10613 . · arXiv
  14. Liao, R., Jia, X., Ma, Y., Tresp, V., 2023. Gentkg: Generative forecasting on temporal knowledge graph. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.07793 . · arXiv
  15. Mei, H., Eisner, J., 2017. The neural hawkes process: A neurally self- modulating multivariate point process, in: Guyon, I., von Luxburg, U., Bengio, S., Wallach, H.M., Fergus, R., Vishwanathan, S.V.N., Garnett, R. (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2017, December 4- 9, 2017, Long Beach, CA, USA, Curran Associates, Inc., New York, NY, USA. pp. 6754-6764. URL: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/ 2017/hash/6463c88460bd63bbe256e495c63aa40b-Abstract.html.
  16. Messner, J., Abboud, R., Ceylan, İ. İ., 2022. Temporal knowledge graph completion using box embeddings, in: Thirty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2022, Thirty-Fourth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, IAAI 2022, The Twelveth Sympo- sium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, EAAI 2022 Virtual Event, February 22 -March 1, 2022, AAAI Press. pp. 7779-7787. URL: https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/20746.
  17. Sun, Z., Deng, Z., Nie, J., Tang, J., 2019. Rotate: Knowledge graph embed- ding by relational rotation in complex space, in: 7th International Confer- ence on Learning Representations, ICLR 2019, OpenReview.net, New Or- leans, LA, USA. URL: https://openreview.net/forum?id=HkgEQnRqYQ.
  18. Trivedi, R., Dai, H., Wang, Y., Song, L., 2017. Know-evolve: Deep temporal reasoning for dynamic knowledge graphs, in: Precup, D., Teh, Y.W. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2017, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 6-11 August 2017, PMLR, Cambridge, MA, USA. pp. 3462-3471. URL: http://proceedings.mlr. press/v70/trivedi17a.html.
  19. Trouillon, T., Welbl, J., Riedel, S., Gaussier, É., Bouchard, G., 2016. Complex embeddings for simple link prediction, in: Proceedings of The 33rd International conference on machine learning, PMLR, New York, NY, USA. pp. 2071-2080. URL: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v48/ trouillon16.html.
  20. Vashishth, S., Sanyal, S., Nitin, V., Talukdar, P.P., 2020. Composition- based multi-relational graph convolutional networks, in: 8th Interna- tional Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2020, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, April 26-30, 2020, OpenReview.net, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. URL: https://openreview.net/forum?id=BylA_C4tPr.
  21. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, L.u., Polosukhin, I., 2017. Attention is all you need, in: Guyon, I., Luxburg, U.V., Bengio, S., Wal- lach, H., Fergus, R., Vishwanathan, S., Garnett, R. (Eds.), Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Curran Associates, Inc. URL: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/ 2017/file/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Paper.pdf.
  22. Velickovic, P., Cucurull, G., Casanova, A., Romero, A., Liò, P., Bengio, Y., 2018. Graph attention networks, in: 6th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2018, Vancouver, BC, Canada, April 30 - May 3, 2018, Conference Track Proceedings, OpenReview.net, Vancouver, BC, Canada. URL: https://openreview.net/forum?id=rJXMpikCZ.
  23. Wang, R., zheng li, Sun, D., Liu, S., Li, J., Yin, B., Abdelzaher, T., 2022b. Learning to sample and aggregate: Few-shot reasoning over tem- poral knowledge graphs, in: Oh, A.H., Agarwal, A., Belgrave, D., Cho, K. (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. URL: https://openreview.net/forum?id=1LmgISIDZJ.
  24. Xia, Y., Zhang, M., Liu, Q., Wu, S., Zhang, X.Y., 2022. MetaTKG: Learning evolutionary meta-knowledge for temporal knowledge graph rea- soning, in: Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Association for Computational Linguis- tics, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. pp. 7230-7240. URL: https: //aclanthology.org/2022.emnlp-main.487.
  25. Zhang, M., Xia, Y., Liu, Q., Wu, S., Wang, L., 2023a. Learning latent rela- tions for temporal knowledge graph reasoning, in: Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp. 12617-12631.
  26. Zhu, C., Chen, M., Fan, C., Cheng, G., Zhang, Y., 2021. Learning from history: Modeling temporal knowledge graphs with sequential copy- generation networks, in: Thirty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intel- ligence, AAAI 2021, Thirty-Third Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, IAAI 2021, The Eleventh Symposium on Educa- tional Advances in Artificial Intelligence, EAAI 2021, Virtual Event, Febru- ary 2-9, 2021, AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA, USA. pp. 4732-4740. URL: https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/16604.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Cai, L., Mao, X., Zhou, Y., Long, Z., Wu, C., & Lan, M.
Affiliations
  • Guizhou University (CN)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2403.04782
arXiv
2403.04782
OpenAlex
W4392677955
Cited by
68
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 9
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (72192820, 72192824)
  • Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
Keywords
temporal knowledge graphs, knowledge graph embedding, dynamic knowledge graphs, entity embeddings, relation embeddings, knowledge graph evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review