Cited by 1,626scientometrics and bibliometrics researchBusiness Strategies and Management ResearchPsychology Research and Bibliometrics

Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: a bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal , 1980–2000

Ramos‐Rodríguez, Antonio‐Rafael, Ruíz‐Navarro, José·2004·Strategic Management Journal

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to identify the works that have had the greatest impact on strategic management research and to analyze the changes that have taken place in the intellectual structure of this discipline. The methodology is based on the bibliometric techniques of citation and co‐citation analysis which are applied to all the articles published in the Strategic Management Journal from its first issue in 1980 through 2000. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smj.397

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The selection of journal articles helps to ensure the reliability and academic nature of the analysis because these resources provide a representative sample of international scientific activity.

    “The selection of journal articles helps to ensure the reliability and academic nature of the analysis (Ramos-Rodríguez and Ruíz-Navarro 2004) because these resources provide a representative sample of international scientific activity.”

    From Blockchain technology in the smart city: A bibliometric review (2022) · cites this paper as Ramos-Rodríguez and Ruíz-Navarro 2004

  • Articles and reviews are categorised as certified knowledge.

    “Since Rodriguez and Navarro(2004) categorised articles and reviews as certified knowledge”

    From Big Data and supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis (2018) · cites this paper as Rodriguez and Navarro(2004)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 97 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramos‐Rodríguez, A., & Ruíz‐Navarro, J.
Affiliations
Universidad de Cádiz (ES)
Venue
Strategic Management Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-08-26
Volume
25
Issue
10
Pages
981-1004
ISSN
  • 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0266
OpenAlex
W2088037265
Cited by
1,626
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 71 · 2025: 130 · 2024: 158 · 2023: 164 · 2022: 168 · 2021: 153 · 2020: 121 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 40
FWCI
18.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Strategic Management Journal (publishedVersion)
  • RODIN (Universidad de Cádiz) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Business Strategies and Management Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Keywords
strategic management research, intellectual structure, citation analysis, co-citation analysis, research trends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review