CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 7,101Face and Expression RecognitionTopological and Geometric Data AnalysisStochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques

UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction

Open access
McInnes, Leland, Healy, John, Melville, James·2018·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1802.03426
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

UMAP (Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection) is a novel manifold learning technique for dimension reduction. UMAP is constructed from a theoretical framework based in Riemannian geometry and algebraic topology. The result is a practical scalable algorithm that applies to real world data. The UMAP algorithm is competitive with t-SNE for visualization quality, and arguably preserves more of the global structure with superior run time performance. Furthermore, UMAP has no computational restrictions on embedding dimension, making it viable as a general purpose dimension reduction technique for machine learning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1802.03426

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • UMAP attempts to preserve local distances, so the relative proximity of points indicates similarity of population activities at those time instances.

    “UMAP attempts to preserve local distances, so the relative proximity of points indicates similarity of population activities at those time instances.”

    From A Role of Environmental Complexity on Representation Learning in Deep Reinforcement Learning Agents (2024) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Weaknesses section (p. 45) says UMAP prioritizes local distances and aims to represent local structure, supporting the general idea that nearby embedded points can reflect similarity. But the same section (p. 48) cautions that UMAP preserves topology rather than pure metric distances and does not explicitly preserve nearest-neighbor relationships. The paper does not address population activities at time instances specifically. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • hdWGCNA includes a novel approach for visualizing genes and the underlying network in a two-dimensional manifold of co-expression space using UMAP.

    “Additionally, hdWGCNA includes a novel approach for visualizing genes and the underlying network in a two-dimensional manifold of co-expression space using UMAP.19”

    From hdWGCNA identifies co-expression networks in high-dimensional transcriptomics data (2023) · cites this paper as [19]

  • An independent quantitative analysis of synaptic density across T1 neuromere voxels, reduced with UMAP, produced clear clusters of motor neurons innervating synergistic muscles, corroborating the MN-to-muscle matches.

    “We developed an independent, parallel quantitative analysis that corroborates the MN-to-muscle matches (Supplementary Fig. 18).”

    From Connectomic reconstruction of a female Drosophila ventral nerve cord (2024) · cites this paper as [73]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. [1][1] E Alpaydin and Fevzi Alimoglu. Pen-based recognition of handwritten digits data set. university of california, irvine. Machine Learning Repository. Irvine: University of California , 4(2), 1998. -
  2. [4][4] Etienne Becht, Charles-Antoine Dutertre, Immanuel W.H. Kwok, Lai Guan Ng, Florent Ginhoux, and Evan W Newell. Evaluation of umap as an alternative to t-sne for single-cell data. bioRxiv , 2018. -
  3. [10][10] Lars Buitinck, Gilles Louppe, Mathieu Blondel, Fabian Pedregosa, Andreas Mueller, Olivier Grisel, Vlad Niculae, Peter Prettenhofer, Alexandre Gramfort, Jaques Grobler, Robert Layton, Jake VanderPlas, Arnaud Joly, Brian Holt, and Ga¨ el Varoquaux. API design for machine learning software: experiences from the scikit-learn project. In ECML PKDD Workshop: Languages for Data Mining and Machine Learning , pages 108-122, 2013. -
  4. [14][14] Shan Carter, Zan Armstrong, Ludwig Schubert, Ian Johnson, and Chris Olah. Activation atlas. Distill , 2019. https://distill.pub/2019/activation-atlas. -
  5. [16][16] Ronald R Coifman and St´ ephane Lafon. Diffusion maps. Applied and computational harmonic analysis , 21(1):5-30, 2006. -
  6. [18][18] Wei Dong, Charikar Moses, and Kai Li. Efficient k-nearest neighbor graph construction for generic similarity measures. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web , WWW'11, pages 577-586, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM. -
  7. [31][31] Siu Kwan Lam, Antoine Pitrou, and Stanley Seibert. Numba: A llvmbased python jit compiler. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on the LLVM Compiler Infrastructure in HPC , LLVM '15, pages 7:1-7:6, New York, NY, USA, 2015. ACM. -
  8. [40][40] J Peter May. Simplicial objects in algebraic topology , volume 11. University of Chicago Press, 1992. -
  9. [51][51] Josef Spidlen, Karin Breuer, Chad Rosenberg, Nikesh Kotecha, and Ryan R Brinkman. Flowrepository: A resource of annotated flow cytometry datasets associated with peer-reviewed publications. Cytometry Part A , 81(9):727-731, 2012. -
  10. [54][54] Jian Tang, Jingzhou Liu, Ming Zhang, and Qiaozhu Mei. Visualizing large-scale and high-dimensional data. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web , pages 287-297. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 2016. -
  11. [60][60] Laurens van der Maaten and Geoffrey Hinton. Visualizing data using t-SNE. Journal of Machine Learning Research , 9:2579-2605, 2008. -
  12. [64][64] Liu Yang and Rong Jin. Distance metric learning: A comprehensive survey. Michigan State Universiy , 2(2):4, 2006. -
  13. [65][65] Lofti A Zadeh. Information and control. Fuzzy sets , 8(3):338-353, 1965.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
McInnes, L., Healy, J., & Melville, J.
ORCID
McInnes, Leland
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2018
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1802.03426
OpenAlex
W2786672974
Cited by
7,101
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 421 · 2025: 1002 · 2024: 1297 · 2023: 1158 · 2022: 896 · 2021: 1254 · 2020: 728 · 2019: 300 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1904146)
  • American Diabetes Association (1-18-IBS-281)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA028761)
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG024824)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007863)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI091627)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK107583)
  • Division of Chemistry (CHE-1904146, 1904146)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
Keywords
UMAP, dimensionality reduction, manifold learning, Riemannian geometry, algebraic topology, data visualization, global structure preservation, scalable algorithms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review