The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bayesian Estimation and Testing of Structural Equation Models
Abstract
The Gibbs sampler can be used to obtain samples of arbitrary size from the posterior distribution over the parameters of a structural equation model (SEM) given covariance data and a prior distribution over the parameters. Point estimates, standard deviations and interval estimates for the parameters can be computed from these samples. If the prior distribution over the parameters is uninformative, the posterior is proportional to the likelihood, and asymptotically the inferences based on the Gibbs sample are the same as those based on the maximum likelihood solution, for example, output from LISREL or EQS. In small samples, however, the likelihood surface is not Gaussian and in some cases contains local maxima. Nevertheless, the Gibbs sample comes from the correct posterior distribution over the parameters regardless of the sample size and the shape of the likelihood surface. With an informative prior distribution over the parameters, the posterior can be used to make inferences about the parameters underidentified models, as we illustrate on a simple errors-in-variables model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities
Gelfand, A. E., & Smith, A. F. M. (1990) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1990.10476213 · Cited by 6,606
Bayesian computation via the Gibbs sampler and related Markov chain Monte Carlo methods
Smith, A. F. M., & Roberts, G. O. (1993) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1993.tb01466.x · Cited by 1,713
Model Selection and Accounting for Model Uncertainty in Graphical Models Using Occam's Window
Madigan, D., & Raftery, A. E. (1994) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1994.10476894 · Cited by 1,205 · cited 1×
“has been applied to SEM by Raftery and Madigan ( Madigan & Raftery, 1991; Raftery”
Method
Cited by
Structural Equation Modeling and Natural Systems
Grace, J. B. (2006) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511617799 · Cited by 2,432
Bayesian structural equation modeling: A more flexible representation of substantive theory
Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2012) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0026802 · Cited by 1,562
(2004) · Springer Texts in Statistics · doi:10.1007/b98963 · Cited by 517
Lee, S.-Y., & Song, X.-Y. (2004) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3904_4 · Cited by 488
blavaan : Bayesian Structural Equation Models via Parameter Expansion
Merkle, E. C., & Rosseel, Y. (2018) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v085.i04 · Cited by 360
Metadata
- Authors
- Scheines, R., Hoijtink, H., & Boomsma, A.
- Venue
- Psychometrika
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-52
- ISSN
- 0033-3123 (ISSN-L)
- 1860-0980
- OpenAlex
- W2130783497
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bayesian Estimation and Testing of Structural Equation Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf02294318
- The paper
- Scheines, R., Hoijtink, H., & Boomsma, A. (1999). Bayesian Estimation and Testing of Structural Equation Models. Psychometrika. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02294318
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.