Cited by 488Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferencePsychometric Methodologies and TestingStatistical Distribution Estimation and Applications

Evaluation of the Bayesian and Maximum Likelihood Approaches in Analyzing Structural Equation Models with Small Sample Sizes

Lee, Sik-Yum, Song, Xin-Yuan·2004·Multivariate Behavioral Research

Abstract

The main objective of this article is to investigate the empirical performances of the Bayesian approach in analyzing structural equation models with small sample sizes. The traditional maximum likelihood (ML) is also included for comparison. In the context of a confirmatory factor analysis model and a structural equation model, simulation studies are conducted with the different magnitudes of parameters and sample sizes n = da, where d = 2, 3, 4 and 5, and a is the number of unknown parameters. The performances are evaluated in terms of the goodness-of-fit statistics, and various measures on the accuracy of the estimates. The conclusion is: for data that are normally distributed, the Bayesian approach can be used with small sample sizes, whilst ML cannot.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327906mbr3904_4

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, S.-Y., & Song, X.-Y.
Venue
Multivariate Behavioral Research
Published
2004-10
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
653-686
ISSN
  • 0027-3171 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7906
OpenAlex
W1999291824
Cited by
488
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 14
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Multivariate Behavioral Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Keywords
Bayesian structural equation modeling, maximum likelihood estimation, small sample size, confirmatory factor analysis, goodness-of-fit statistics, estimation accuracy, simulation study, normal data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review