The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Taxonomy of Item Response Models
Abstract
A number of models for categorical item response data have been proposed in recent years. The models appear to be quite different. However, they may usefully be organized as members of only three distinct classes, within which the models are distinguished only by assumptions and constraints on their parameters. “Difference models” are appropriate for ordered responses, “divide-by-total” models may be used for either ordered or nominal responses, and “left-side added” models are used for multiple-choice responses with guessing. The details of the taxonomy and the models are described in this paper.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Rasch model for partial credit scoring
Masters, G. N. (1982) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02296272 · Cited by 3,782
Estimation of Latent Ability Using a Response Pattern of Graded Scores
Samejima, F. (1969) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf03372160 · Cited by 2,194
Cited by
The theoretical status of latent variables.
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2003) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.110.2.203 · Cited by 1,566
A Generalized Partial Credit Model: Application of an EM Algorithm
Muraki, E. (1992) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662169201600206 · Cited by 1,535
Interpreting Change Scores of Tests and Measures Used in Physical Therapy
Haley, S. M., & Fragala-Pinkham, M. A. (2006) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/86.5.735 · Cited by 937
Samejima, F. (1997) · Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2691-6_5 · Cited by 934
Item factor analysis: Current approaches and future directions.
Wirth, R. J., & Edwards, M. C. (2007) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.12.1.58 · Cited by 910
Metadata
- Authors
- Thissen, D., & Steinberg, L.
- Venue
- Psychometrika
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1986-12
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 567-577
- ISSN
- 0033-3123 (ISSN-L)
- 1860-0980
- OpenAlex
- W1998216907
- Cited by
- 413
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
