The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Graded Response Model
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores
Rozeboom, W. W., Lord, F. M., Novick, M. R., & Birnbaum, A. (1969) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1162101 · Cited by 8,022
A Rasch model for partial credit scoring
Masters, G. N. (1982) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02296272 · Cited by 3,782
ESTIMATION OF LATENT ABILITY USING A RESPONSE PATTERN OF GRADED SCORES1
Samejima, F. (1968) · ETS Research Bulletin Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.1968.tb00153.x · Cited by 2,587
Self-citationMarginal Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Item Parameters: Application of an EM Algorithm
Bock, R. D., & Aitkin, M. (1981) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02293801 · Cited by 2,339
Estimation of Latent Ability Using a Response Pattern of Graded Scores
Samejima, F. (1969) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf03372160 · Cited by 2,194
Self-citationA Generalized Partial Credit Model: Application of an EM Algorithm
Muraki, E. (1992) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662169201600206 · Cited by 1,535
Bock, R. D. (1972) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291411 · Cited by 1,228
Statistical theories of mental test scores
Lord, F. M., Novick, M. R., & Birnbaum, A. (1974) · Cited by 1,158
A Taxonomy of Item Response Models
Thissen, D., & Steinberg, L. (1986) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02295596 · Cited by 413
Kernel Smoothing Approaches to Nonparametric Item Characteristic Curve Estimation
Ramsay, J. O. (1991) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294494 · Cited by 345
Cited by
Rush, A. J., Trivedi, M. H., Ibrahim, H. M., Carmody, T. J., Arnow, B., Klein, D. N., Markowitz, J. C., Ninan, P. T., Kornstein, S., Manber, R., et al. (2003) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01866-8 · Cited by 3,829
Funk, J. L., & Rogge, R. D. (2007) · Journal of Family Psychology · doi:10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572 · Cited by 1,806
Ordinal Regression Models in Psychology: A Tutorial
Bürkner, P.-C., & Vuorre, M. (2019) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2515245918823199 · Cited by 689
The curiosity and exploration inventory-II: Development, factor structure, and psychometrics
Kashdan, T. B., Gallagher, M. W., Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Breen, W. E., Terhar, D., & Steger, M. F. (2009) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.04.011 · Cited by 674
“The data were analyzed using a two-parameter logistic (2PL) graded-response model (Samejima, 1997), which is a polytomous generalization of a common 2PL model for binary data (Embretson & Reise, 2000; Ostini & Nering, 2006).”
MethodAn item response analysis of the pediatric PROMIS anxiety and depressive symptoms scales
Irwin, D. E., Stucky, B., Langer, M. M., Thissen, D., DeWitt, E. M., Lai, J.-S., Varni, J. W., Yeatts, K., & DeWalt, D. A. (2010) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9619-3 · Cited by 537
Metadata
- Authors
- Samejima, F.
- Venue
- Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory
- Publisher
- Springer New York
- Published
- 1997
- Pages
- 85-100
- OpenAlex
- W73971094
- Cited by
- 934
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 26.73
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Graded Response Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-4757-2691-6_5
- The paper
- Samejima, F. (1997). Graded Response Model. Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2691-6_5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
