The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The real world on a short leash: The (mis) application of constructivism to the design of educational technology
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science
Hacking, I. (1983) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814563 · Cited by 4,814
Cited by
Patterns of engagement in authentic online learning environments
Herrington, J., Oliver, R., & Reeves, T. C. (2003) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.1701 · Cited by 727
Cognitive requirements for learning with open-ended learning environments
Land, S. M. (2000) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02319858 · Cited by 311
Metadata
- Authors
- Petraglia, J.
- Venue
- Educational Technology Research and Development
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 53-65
- ISSN
- 1042-1629 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-6501
- OpenAlex
- W2016689105
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
