Influence of dystrophin-gene mutation onmdx mouse behavior. I. Retention deficits at long delays in spontaneous alternation and bar-pressing tasks
Abstract
X-linked Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is frequently associated with a nonprogressive, cognitive defect attributed to the absence of dystrophin in the brain of DMD patients. The mutant mdx mouse, lacking in 427-kDa dystrophin in both muscle and brain tissues, is considered to be a valuable model of human DMD. In the present study, we compared mdx and C57BL/10 control mice and showed that mdx mice had impaired retention in a T-maze, delayed spontaneous alternation task 24 h, but not 6 h, after acquisition. mdx mice were not impaired in acquisition of a bar-pressing task on 4 consecutive days but showed poor retention 22 days after the last training session. Mutants and controls showed similar behavioral responses in free exploration and light/dark choice situations and did not differ in spontaneous locomotor activity or motor coordination. Retention impairments at long delays in mdx mice suggest a role of dystrophin in long-term consolidation processes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The mdx mouse model of DMD shows impairment of memory consolidation in certain behavior tasks.
“The animal model of DMD, the mdx mouse, showed impairment of memory consolidation in certain behavior tasks (Sicinski et al., 1989;Muntoni et al., 1991;Vaillend et al., 1995;Vaillend et al., 2004)”
From The Brain-Enriched MicroRNA miR-9-3p Regulates Synaptic Plasticity and Memory (2016) · cites this paper as Vaillend et al., 1995
Cites
X chromosome-linked muscular dystrophy (mdx) in the mouse
Bulfield, G., Siller, W. G., Wight, P. A., & Moore, K. J. (1984) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.81.4.1189 · Cited by 1,765 · see citing works
Fiber regeneration is not persistent in dystrophic (MDX) mouse skeletal muscle
DiMario, J. X., Uzman, A., & Strohman, R. C. (1991) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/0012-1606(91)90340-9 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hughes, R. N. (2004) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.06.006 · Cited by 641 · see citing works
The Brain-Enriched MicroRNA miR-9-3p Regulates Synaptic Plasticity and Memory
Sim, S.-E., Lim, C.-S., Kim, J.-I., Seo, D., Chun, H., Yu, N.-K., Lee, J., Kang, S. J., Ko, H.-G., Choi, J.-H., et al. (2016) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0630-16.2016 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
- Authors
- Vaillend, C., Rendon, A., Misslin, R., & Ungerer, A.
- Venue
- Behavior Genetics
- Published
- 1995-11
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 569-579
- ISSN
- 0001-8244
- 1573-3297
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review