Cited by 13Primate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and ReproductionAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

Social relationships in a captive group of Diana monkeys (Cercopithecus diana)

Byrne, R. W., Conning, A. M., Young, J.·1983·Primates

Abstract

A captive, unimale breeding group of Diana monkeys was observed during the development of three infants, and a quantitative description of social interactions is presented. Adult females associate with females of adjacent rank, while the adult male and juvenile are peripheral. Dominance rank determines, for each dyad of adults, which animal has the major role in maintaining mutual proximity, as well as priority of access to preferred foods. Initially, a new infant is a focus of attention for all animals, but with time the infant takes over the main role in maintaining proximity: first to the mother, then to other young animals and finally to the other adult female. The adult male's behaviour towards an infant is qualitatively different to that of other animals. The possible origins of this pattern of behaviour is discussed in terms of selective advantages to a female-bonded, uni-male monkey.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02381981

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Booth, A., 1958. The zoogeography of West African primates: a review.Bull. IFAN, A20: 587–622.
  2. Galat-Luong, A. &G. Galat, 1978.Abondance relative et associations plurispécifiques des primates diurnes du Parc National de Tai, Cote d'Ivorie. Centre ORSTOM, Abijan.
  3. Hausfater, G., 1975.Dominance and Reproduction in Baboons; A Quantitative Analysis. Contributions to Primatology, Vol. 7, S. Karger, Basel.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Byrne, R. W., Conning, A. M., & Young, J.
Affiliations
University of St Andrews (GB)
Venue
Primates
Published
1983-07
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
360-370
ISSN
  • 0032-8332 (ISSN-L)
  • 1610-7365
OpenAlex
W2042298658
Cited by
13
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Primates (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
Diana monkey, Cercopithecus diana, interpersonal relationships, dominance rank, social interaction, infant development, maternal care, female bonding, food access, captive primate groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review