Cited by 208EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsNeuroscience and Neural Engineering

Finite-element model of the human head: scalp potentials due to dipole sources

Yan, Y., Nunez, P. L., Hart, R. T.·1991·Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing

Abstract

Three-dimensional finite-element models provide a method to study the relationship between human scalp potentials and neural current sources inside the brain. A new formulation of dipole-like current sources is developed here. Finite-element analyses based on this formulation are carried out for both a three-concentric-spheres model and a human-head model. Differences in calculated scalp potentials between these two models are studied in the context of the forward and inverse problems in EEG. The effects of the eye orbit structure on surface potential distribution are also studied.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02442317

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For realistic-geometry head models, numeric solutions are attainable with the boundary element method assuming isotropic conductivity or the finite element method assuming anisotropic conductivity.

    “For realistic-geometry head models, numeric solutions are attainable with either the boundary element method (BEM) by assuming isotropic conductivity (13, 14) or the finite element method (FEM) models by assuming anisotropic conductivity (15).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yan, Y., Nunez, P. L., & Hart, R. T.
Affiliations
  • George Washington University (US)
  • Tulane University (US)
Venue
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
Published
1991-09
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
475-481
ISSN
  • 0140-0118 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-0444
OpenAlex
W2077123128
Cited by
208
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (1R01N524314)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Keywords
human head model, finite element model, scalp potentials, dipole source, EEG forward problem, EEG inverse problem, surface potential distribution
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Brain, Computer Simulation, Electroencephalography, Humans, Models, Neurological, Scalp

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review