Cited by 512Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducator Training and Historical PedagogyVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

Scaffolding critical reasoning about history and social issues in multimedia-supported learning environments

Saye, John W., Brush, Thomas·2002·Educational Technology Research and Development

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02505026

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Scaffolding has led to promising results in subject areas outside of STEM, including social studies (Brush & Saye, 2001; Nussbaum, 2002; Saye & Brush, 2002), language arts (Proctor, Dalton, & Grisham, 2007), and teacher education (Chua, Tan, & Liu, 2015).

    “Scaffolding has led to promising results in subject areas outside of STEM, including social studies (Brush & Saye, 2001; Nussbaum, 2002; Saye & Brush, 2002), language arts (Proctor, Dalton, & Grisham, 2007), and teacher education (Chua, Tan, & Liu, 2015).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saye, J. W., & Brush, T.
Affiliations
  • Auburn University (US)
  • Indiana University (US)
Corresponding author
Saye, John W.
Venue
Educational Technology Research and Development
Published
2002-09
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
77-96
ISSN
  • 1042-1629 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-6501
OpenAlex
W2043943489
Cited by
512
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 21
FWCI
10.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Technology Research and Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
scaffolding, critical reasoning, history and social studies education, problem-based learning, hypermedia learning environments, ill-structured problems, complex thinking, teacher support, disciplinary inquiry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review