Cited by 2,192Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational Assessment and Pedagogy

Instructional Design Theories and Models

Charles M. Reigeluth·1983·Routledge eBooks

Abstract

Instructional Design Theories and Models is a thorough yet concise overview of eight of the most comprehensive and best-known attempts to integrate knowledge about effective and appealing instruction. Chapters were written by the original theorists to provide a more accurate and behind-the-scenes look at the theories' development. Instructional Des

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780203824283

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reigeluth, C. M.
Corresponding author
Charles M. Reigeluth
Venue
Routledge eBooks
Publisher
Routledge
Published
1983-11-01
OpenAlex
W1493910332
Cited by
2,192
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 94 · 2014: 80 · 2013: 95 · 2012: 86
FWCI
14.72
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
Keywords
instructional design theory, instructional design model, teaching effectiveness, history of instructional design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review