Cited by 18Muscle activation and electromyography studiesNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringMuscle Physiology and Disorders

Influence of synchronous and sequential stimulation on muscle fatigue

Open access
Thomsen, M., Veltink, P. H.·1997·Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing

Abstract

In acute experiments the sciatic nerve of the rat is electrically stimulated to induce fatigue in the medial Gastrocnemius muscle. Fatigue tests are carried out using intermittent stimulation of different compartments (sequential) or a single compartment (synchronous) of the sciatic nerve. The activation of different compartments is achieved by dividing nerve fibres into subbundles and placing them in separate grooves in a multigroove electrode. The aim of the investigation is to quantify the effect of sequential contra synchronised stimulation in reducing muscle fatigue, with no overlap between compartments. Overlap between two compartments is calculated using the combined and individual forces from both compartments. Sequential stimulation of two and three compartments is investigated. There is a significant decrease of fatigue in sequential stimulation compared to synchronous. After 2 min of intermittent stimulation the force time level is significantly increased in sequential stimulation, than in synchronous stimulation. The rate of force time decrease is significantly slower in sequential stimulation than in synchronous stimulation. With sequential stimulation it takes significantly longer before the maximal force time is reached than with synchronous stimulation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02530036

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thomsen, M., & Veltink, P. H.
Affiliations
  • Aalborg University (DK)
  • University of Twente (NL)
Venue
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
Published
1997-05
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
186-192
ISSN
  • 0140-0118 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-0444
OpenAlex
W2156480426
Cited by
18
References
26
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation
  • Danmarks Grundforskningsfond
  • University of Twente
  • Forskerakademiet
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Keywords
muscle fatigue, sequential stimulation, sciatic nerve, gastrocnemius, intermittent electrical stimulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Electric Stimulation, Sciatic Nerve, Rats, Wistar, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Fatigue, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review